Writing

Many young people want to choose well-paid jobs in the future. This essay will argue that the disadvantages of this outweigh the benefits. The essay will first demonstrate that this trend causes people to ignore other aspects of a good job and miss the opportunity to specialize in a profession, followed by an analysis of how the primary advantage namely, a high salary covering high expenses and providing a convenient life, is not entirely valid.

The main reason why choosing a job based on salary is not truly beneficial is that it causes individuals to overlook other important aspects of a job, such as the working environment, work hours, and promotion opportunities. Therefore, despite the initial desire to get the job, they may eventually find themselves overwhelmed and frustrated, working in a position that does not match their personality or skills. Furthermore, becoming a professional in a career takes time and requires individuals to dedicate themselves to learning skills and gaining experience. Some careers, such as software development, require patience and persistence. Although it may take several years for a developer to master their field, those who commit to the profession often get rewarding positions. Without long-term dedication, people may miss the opportunity to establish a stable career.

On the contrary, modern life is becoming increasingly expensive, making many people to seek well-paid jobs to cover their expenses. In many parts of the world, the cost of living including rent, groceries, and clothing is rising rapidly, raising concerns among young people about their future financial status. This makes them prioritize salary when choosing a career. However, they should consider that failing to take all aspects of a job into account may lead to dissatisfaction, ultimately having an adverse impact on their well-being. For example, a person who is not interested in office work but gets a position in this field may gradually become exhausted from doing mundane tasks, despite receiving high incentives.

In conclusion, the drawbacks of opting for a job solely because of its salary such as neglecting other important factors and failing to develop expertise in a specialized field clearly outweigh the argument of financial security. While a high salary may seem appealing in the short term, long-term career satisfaction and personal fulfillment should be prioritized.

Writing

The emphasis on how people need to dress according to the type of their job, position and work place is not a recent issue but is being more cared about nowadays and its importance is increasing all over the world. However, there are still some groups who believe the responsibility of employees should be considered more than what they wear. In my opinion, although the quality at work is the first and the most important factor, the appearance of staff also takes a key role.

To begin with, it is known as a prevalent idea that quality is more essential than the clothes at work, and no one could deny the fact that it is professional and hardworking employees who lead to high standards and good profits not the way they look. Qualified staff are more reliable and useful as they tend to do their upmost by being on time and up to date instead of being obsessive about what they wear. The company Goldman Sachs which has recently announced its relaxing dress code to focus more on the performance of workers, make them feel comfortable and confident could be a fine example. In addition, paying too much attention to a typical dress code could cause strict restriction, decrease in the number of  motivated staff and the quality of business. Employers need to be reminded that employees' attampt and industrious guarantee the company's success rather than their the way they dress. Therefore, the awareness must be raised that performance is more crucial than the clothes. 

However, suitable attire could have positive and undeniable effects. When this animated subject is under discussion, the most effective reason to care about the clothes, is a good impression on clients, especially the first one. Choosing the right clothes in the business, where gathering or attracting clients are vital, sets the team on the right path as they would trust such organized, well-dressed crews easier. I never forget the time I was an active member of a well-known system and was supposed to participate in the meetings using formal clothes and how I dressed could result in better agreements. Furthermore, the needed clothes selected by personnels shows a high level of professionalism depending on what is compatible with the jobs they have. To be more precise, work staff are required to choose what they wear based on their profession. For instance, at a construction site, everyone should wear hard hats, sometimes safety boots, and other protective gear, or in an office, employees need to apply the proper business attire to create an image of professionalism and send a message to clients that we are serious about what is done. Thus, paying enough attention to what is worn at work could be so beneficial. 

In conclusion, despite the quality at work which should be prioritized as the initial and most significant feature of employees, their appearance ought to be highlighted as an effective feature at the same time.

Writing

It is controversially argued that the way wherein employees appear in the professional environments is not considered to be significance as much as by which quality and effectiveness they work. Although I justifiably agree with that, I believe that the whole picture has not been taken into account, seemingly.

From efficiency point of view, it should be considered that employees generally are paid for the benefits which they are supposed to bring for their company and colleagues. This simply means that based on prioritization, everything except their quality of work goes to the second place, which is assumed to lead to a lower amount of disturbance and a higher level of comfort and productivity in the majority cases. More precisely, in particular a worth considering period of time might be devoted into getting dressed and prepared for work, which can be put into more productive activities at the work itself. Moreover, appreciating the clothing style of people, especially employees of an office, is counted as a contributory factor in affording comfort in working atmosphere, improving the general level of self-esteem and well-being.

On the other hand, appearing in a proper-for-work style is mostly considered as a sign of self-discipline and how much the job is valued by employees. In other words, in most cases there has been a great deal of legislation in offices and companies which are apparently believed not to have any impact on boosting the efficiency of employees, and even may come to the mind as obstacles. Nonetheless, they are expected to be responsible for establishment and maintenance of regularity at work by being complied by all the members of the firm, expressing their respect and commitment to their organization and their job. For example, clothing appropriately could be recognized as one easy-to-follow law by which commitment can be communicated.

In conclusion, despite the benefits that respecting some mundane rules brings for employees of a company, like how they are going to dress, I personally believe that merits of concentrating on the quality of work rather than conforming to those rules are more worth paying attention in most cases.

Writing

Employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress at work. They should only care about the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that the outfit look of workforces should not be considered necessary by employers and they should just focus on qualifications and skills that employer provide. I personally disagree with this idea and I think in addition to skills and knowledge, other criteria should be involved in company’s assessments.

On the one hand, I accept that the employees’ skills and performance is definitely important, but the way they dress should not be neglected by authorities. One reason is that, how people are appeared in the society particularly at office, may affect others’ perspectives, in a way that a suitable style can lead to people being respected or considered more acceptable by others.   

In addition, the level of employees outfit importance depends on what kind of work place it is. For instance in some vocational professions the prior factor is how much they are experienced or skilled. Weather, having an appropriate dress-code in some companies such as engineering offices or marketing holdings is an essential factor that may bring sense of community and harmony in the workplace, so it is necessary for a high-grade company to have a harmonious atmosphere and well-organized community in order to be prestigious and valued, and what its personnels wear is one of the most important features apart from how well they work or how much expert they are.

In conclusion, although it is really important for employers to have skillful staffs in their companies, the way people look is also a feature that should not be neglected.

Writing

It is argued that employers should not emphasize employees' attire and appearance, as the quality of work is the most vital factor. While an employee's dress might be important for some reasons, it should not be prioritized over the quality of their work. 

To begin with, employees' outfits based on an official dress code at work can give customers an impression of professionalism and seriousness. For example, according to a global survey, people naturally tend to ask questions and take advice from those with neat, offical suits rather than individuals with casual clothes because of the better first impression and a sense of trust the first group gives to clients. As a result, many companies prefer to consider a special dress code for their workers, especially in sections such as customer service in which client intercation is key. Moreover, with the increasing number of multinational companies around the world, having a written, official regulation for dressing at work reduces the chance of conflict due to different perspectives about clothes. These kinds of arguments, which mainly stem from cultural differences, can greatly affect a business's productivity but can be addressed by considering neutral yet strict official clothes. 

While graments may attract more customers and provide a comfortable work environment for workers, it is a tiny fragment that can enhance efficiency. Other aspects such as productivity, creativity, and innovation are fundamental values of a company and in some ways more significant. For instance, many companies today especially those related to IT and artifical inteligence allow their employees to wear what they feel comfortable in after industrial psychologists realized that a relaxed dress code can greatly boost people's productivity and innovation. In addition, emphasizing too much on dress can lead to a biased approach when it comes to recruiting new staff. Consequently, many talented, creative people with different dress code preferences may be deprived of having their favorite job. 

In conclusion, while it is claimed that having a dress code is critical to build a professional image of a company and a relaxed work environment, I assume putting more importance on factors which can enhance better performance of a company, such as productivity and innovation, would be better for businesses.

Writing

Nowadays, it seems that authorities are becoming more wary of how their employees dress in office environments. Regarding this, some experts suggest that clothing choices should not be a concern. On the other hand, the level of employee performance should be taken into consideration first. In this essay, I will explore this perspective and share my own opinion.

There could be numerous factors why some companies prefer to be strict about clothing in the workplace. One reason they often cite is to prevent distraction. They believe inappropriate dressing, such as overly bright or colorful clothes, may be a significant distraction for employees and, as a result, reduce their performance. Another reason managers emphasize is the desire for the workplace to look neat, orderly, and harmonious. This is why several companies provide their own uniforms for their employees.

On the other hand, some individuals claim that it is not worth it to focus on clothing. I completely agree with them. In this case, they present almost the opposite of the reasons mentioned earlier. Whether workers allow themselves to be distracted by their colleagues' clothing and ruin their work is up to them. Because of this, they also argue that it would be better if these types of people were not employed in the first place—those who cannot commit to their duties properly. Additionally, working in a colorful, vibrant environment has the potential to help workers improve their job quality by keeping them joyful and away from boredom. Moreover, allowing them to wear whatever they want not only keeps them motivated but also saves everyone the trouble of arguing about unnecessary issues like dress codes.

In conclusion, to avoid distraction and to appear neat and visually harmonious, some organizations tend to enforce a uniform code and monitor and discipline their employees accordingly. On the other hand, some people argue that implementing a more relaxed dress code would be a better choice. Allowing various outfits and eliminating restrictions on clothing is likely to keep employees engaged in their duties and uplift their performance. I fully align with the second perspective. Letting people dress however they like is more likely to create a positive work environment.

Writing

 Employers have different approaches regarding the attire of employees. Some strictly establish a dress code, while others solely focus on performance. I strongly believe that corporations must allow employees to dress as they choose and instead focus on employees' proficiency.

A workspace without any restrictions on attire provides a safe place for various people to work as a team for the company’s development. It will benefit the company if the manager assesses an individual’s competence rather than their clothing style when recruiting or while they are working. For example, a young person whose style might not conform to the conventional taste of other employees would probably bring new and unique insights to their area of expertise.

Additionally, planning a dress code and constantly checking whether employees abide by it requires excessive managerial time and energy. One way for companies to tackle the issue of inappropriate attire in the workspace is to design a uniform dress, which requires hiring a professional designer. This is nothing more than an additional expense. Moreover, this project consumes significant time that could be spent boosting the company, for example, by holding sessions to identify the company’s issues and find ways to resolve them.

Some might argue that a dress code reinforces a company's image and reputation. Some claim that it is crucial for corporations to have a strict dress code as it is part of their branding identity and has significant importance in shaping people’s perception of the company. However, most employees do not ever encounter any customers. In addition, reputation and image must derive from the quality of service or product rather than branding.

In conclusion, I contend that employers should completely abandon strict dress codes and focus solely on employee proficiency. Prioritizing employee competence over dress codes fosters a more inclusive, creative, and efficient work environment and also saves valuable time and resources.

Writing

Nowadays, there is a dilemma concerning the appearances of employees in the work place. Some people believe that employers must not care about how their employees dress and their productivity is of greater concern. while there are limits to this significance, i generally believe the quality of work is significantly more vital.

Some might argue that the way someone dresses at their job directly depicts their professionalism. For instance, a large company’s CEO might not be respected by their employees anymore, if they were seen wearing shabby and unpleasant clothes. When it comes to showing up to the wrorkplace, people expect to see a certain type of clothes like an ironed suit with no extra prints and designs. Similarly, the same might be accurate for employees. Some employers prefer having their inferiors represent the company's values which are commonly sophistication and professionalism. These firms usually regulate strict laws concerning dresscode, because they are of the opinion that a sophisticated company memebr should also dress as such.

On the other hand, many company authorities let their employees be responsible for their own dress choices. Usually, in such companies the boss provides a free environment where people are mentally and physically comfortable. Since many corporate jobs have people spend more than 8 hours of their day in an office, they focus on nurturing an atmosphere where the employees have an ease of mind when coming to work. Consequently, they care more about the outcome of their jobs. This means that while the employees are allowed to choose how they dress, they have higher expectations about the quality of the work and thu, the employers are expected to be productive in their daily tasks rather than how they look.

In conclusion, i am of the opinion that employers should mostly focus about the quality of their employees’ work instead of their dress choices. While there are some benefits to looking professional such as being respected as a sophisticated company member, being mentally at ease makes many people more productive in their job.

Writing

Attire in the workspace is to a person what the cover package is to a product, important but not the essence. Some may claim that workers should not have dress codes in the workspace and they should only be judged based on their work quality. I partially disagree with this statement since I believe while the quality of work outweighs the worker's appearance, certain industries require a minimum level of formality and dress code.

On the one hand, qualification definitely takes precedence over dressing in the workplace. Critical skills like problem-solving, communication, and perseverance are what truly contribute to an organization's success rather than their employees' appearance. For instance, tech giants like Meta and Google, adopted flexible dress codes for their employees, allowing them to choose to wear clothes that align with their culture and personality instead of something that authorities in charge forced them to wear. This approach helps employees to shift their mindset to more substantial matters and improve their overall productivity. If strict dress codes were imposed in such places, many employees would focus on their appearance instead of their work. 

However, certain industries require a minimum level of formality, which mostly starts with their employees' appearance. Law, medical care, and even restaurants are some of the industries that, unlike tech companies, interact with customers or patients directly. People are drawn to places that can feel a sense of reliability and genuineness. Imagine a lawyer wearing blue skinny jeans instead of a formal suit to the court, diminishing the formality and his respect for the audience. On the other side, take a restaurant as an example in which workers have a united dress, leaving behind a sense of cleanliness to their customers. These all show that specific industries, especially ones that interact directly with clients, require proper appearance in the workspace to prosper.

In conclusion, while employees' working quality and range of skills should be prioritized over appearance, some certain industries that interact directly with their clients must adopt relevant dress codes to succeed.

Writing

Some people think corporate dress codes shouldn't be of a concern, and employers should only judge based on the work quality. However, I disagree with this statement because some dress codes are important from mental and physical perspective, and abandoning them can lower the quality of work. 

Formal attire can have both psychological and physical purposes. On one hand, these clothes can help workers build a sense of confidence. Not only that but, special dress codes can also foster a sense of unity among employees. Many police officers who wear the special uniform feel confident when they chase a criminal because it gives them a sense of authority, also it makes them feel as a member of a big organization of police department. In terms of physical objectives of some suits, in some work conditions, special suits are designed by professionals to protect workers from potential risk at work such as welding suits for welders to protect their them from skin or eye damage.

Moreover, I believe the job quality might decline if employers forgo formal dressing at work. For a salesman whose job is to persuade other people to buy their product, dressing casually can impair their first impression, which is claimed to be very important in sales. In fact, appearing in a sloppy cloth as opposed to wearing a formal dress can imply a lack of seriousness in work ethic, resulting in failed deals at negotiation tables. Additionally, adopting this policy will compromise order in the workplace. The resulted comfort would cause some employees to mistook their work environment as their home which can further exacerbate the issue of seriousness in work by loosening the obedience to rules. 

In conclusion, I believe special and strict dress codes in work settings are important because some of these not only boost the confidence of workers but also it helps to protect them from dangerous work conditions. Additionally, weak policies regarding this can affect the work quality in such environments.