Logo
تصحیح رایگان رایتینگ آیلتس
Monday 20th of January 2025
دوشنبه, 01 بهمن 1403

برترین های این هفته

7.5

Jaberi
Jaberi

Topic

The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012.

#237695

Writing

The ensuing graph provides information on the existence of numerous ingredients  changing taste to sweet in the America between 1966 and 2011.

Overall, although refine cane and beet sugars accounted for the greatest U.S. per person over first two decades, corn sweeteners made up the greatest in the overwhelming  majority of  remaining years. Also, edible syrups devoted the least weights for each guy over the whole time period on the horizontal axis.

In 1966, refined cane and best sugars stood at somewhere in the vicinity of 98 pounds person. Then, it witnessed  a gradual rise between 1966 and 1973 until it reached a peak of almost 100 pounds per person ; however, sweetener dry- weight per person in the U.S. dipped swiftly to under 85 in 1975. Having registered a sharp climb to nearly 94 in 1977, refined cane and best sugars’ availability for each individual plummeted to almost 60 in 1986. The figure levelled off over the next two decades at 60, followed by a minimal growth approximately 62 in 2012.

By contrast, corn sweeteners  recorded a reverse trend over the whole period. It began at around 12 pounds per person in 1996. Since then,  corn sweeteners’ dry-weight per person soared to 60 pounds in 1985, overtaking refined cane and beet sugars in this year to peak at 80 pounds in 1999. Afterwards, it declined substantially to end at 60 pounds in 2012. Similarly, total sweeteners’ dry-weight per person experienced a period of slight volatility at 125 pounds between 1966 and 1981. Nineteen years on. it rocketed to reach a high of 160 pounds in 1999, compared to an enormous reduction to almost 137 pounds in 2012. Two other sweeteners named honey and edible syrups remained stable at 6 percent and an insignificant minority of total weight over the period shown on horizontal axis, respectively.

7.5

ahmad
ahmad

Topic

Some people say the fashion industry is bad for the environment, as it encourages consumers to buy new clothes all the time. Do you agree or disagree?

#203385

Writing

Opinions widely diverge on whether fashion industry is highly likely to deleteriously affect the environment, since people would be encouraged to spend their money purchasing more and more fashion items. Although certain advocates subscribe to the view that negative consequences will assuredly abound if individuals dedicate a significant portion of their budget to buying garments, I would adopt a rather ambivalent attitude toward this statement, believing that this trend has potential to bring about desired outcomes.

Several underlying reasons exist why some people categorically state that the growth of this insidious trend should be curbed, two examples of which will be highlighted in this essay. Firstly, with major companies producing mass clothes, cargo ships causing significant marine pollution, and modern fabrics containing significant amount of plastic, fashion industry may prove to carry troubling consequences for our planet. Indeed, there is a strong correlation between consumerism and environmental issues: the more inclination people show to buy clothes, the more likely they are to cause damage to the environment. Were it not for fashion wastes piled up in deserts and vacant lands, for instance, global warming would have never been exacerbated at such alarming pace. Secondly, given that recycling of clothes requires a tremendous amount of budget for governments, numerous countries may appear to have no practical solution to address this issue, thereby leaving them in the environment that can lead to disastrous results in distant future. Finally, fresh air and green spaces, often regarded as sine qua non for a healthy life, might seem to be conspicuous by their absence in a society in which people place high value on fashion industry. That is, an increasing number of people would through their old clothes away regularly that can result in air pollution as well as unattractive landscapes. 

On the other hand, mounting evidence demonstrate that wide spread publicity of fashion industry can result in positive results. To begin with, basking in the glory of fashion, individuals have a world of opportunities at their fingertips to boost their confidence to a high level. It is widely acknowledged that shopping is an effective manner of socializing and interacting with the general public. This activity provides individuals a great opportunity to meet, engage with, and befriend people whose ideas, values ,cultures and attitudes are very different from their own, thereby achieving major social breakthrough. Furthermore, from a psychological point of view, people showing no inclination to purchase products in regular bases are more vulnerable to mental issues, such as depression and anxiety, each of which has the potential to leave a destructive mark on their lives. Last but not least, we should not overlook the fact that fashion industry make an appreciable contribution to economy of governments. By benefiting from this dynamic economy, administrations are well-equipped to dedicate generous budgets to create a supportive and cooperative environment, in which each nation perceives themselves as a part of a family and take serious, immediate action to ameliorate global warming. 

In conclusion, despite the aforementioned factors associated with the negative repercussions that fashion industry might seem to have for the environment, I hold the view that this industry is capable of being beneficial for both society and the environment. 

7

Dehghani
Dehghani

Topic

An increasing number of people are changing careers during their working life. What do you think are the reasons for this? Do you think this is a positive or negative development for society?

 

#24567084

Writing

Today, more and more people opt for different jobs throughout their professional life. This phenomenon is happening due to various incentives people have, and I think its advantages outweigh its drawbacks.
On the one hand, nowadays, many workers are tempted by a variety of internal and external motivations to change their career. Initially, the financial incentive is the main reason that persuades people to make this decision. They are looking for occupations that offer better salaries with more benefits. In addition, there are trends towards particular jobs at a time, which affect the social behavior and make some occupations more popular than others. Therefore, a number of people tend to leave their current job and switch to another career. In particular, this is more common for those who work as freelancers.
On the other hand, adoption of this policy by individuals benefits them in many aspects. Firstly, they experience working in different workplaces that helps them improve their relationships and develop their connections with others. Secondly, in the contemporary world, it is essential for people to acquire miscellaneous skills because organizations need workers who can undertake diverse tasks. For instance, software engineers have to learn some programming languages, which are vital in developing software. Finally, this strategy leads to an intense competition, which is more rewarding for hardworking employees, as they can achieve worthwhile positions.
In conclusion, I believe that workers choose their career under the influence of financial reasons and market demands. As a consequence of this, they are able to learn various skills and enhance their curriculum vitae. Moreover, it helps the meritocracy in companies and workplaces.      

7

Zhaleh
Zhaleh

Topic

An increasing number of people are changing careers during their working life. What do you think are the reasons for this? Do you think this is a positive or negative development for society?

 

#24569690

Writing

A significantly larger number of people modify their jobs throughout their working lives for a variety of reasons. I personally believe that this trend of changing careers is a positive development that brings numerous benefits to both individuals and society as a whole.

 

It is undeniable that many individuals undergo career transformations. One primary reason for this shift is financial difficulties. In today's economy, certain jobs and companies offer lower salaries, making it challenging for employees to manage their living expenses. Consequently, individuals may find themselves compelled to seek better-paying opportunities to ensure financial stability. Additionally, job changes often arise from the desire for professional growth. By transitioning between different roles or organizations, workers can acquire a diverse set of skills and experiences. For instance, employees who work in various companies can learn innovative practices and techniques that enhance their expertise. Furthermore, many individuals change jobs to secure better benefits, such as competitive pensions and comprehensive health insurance packages. On the flip side, it is important to acknowledge that some career changes stem from the demanding nature of certain positions, which may involve long hours and significant responsibilities.

 

In my opinion, changing employment can be highly beneficial for both workers and society at large. Firstly, the experience gained from working in a wide range of positions equips individuals with a wealth of professional skills and knowledge. This not only enhances their competency but also boosts their overall productivity in the workplace. Moreover, workers who are adept at navigating various roles and collaborating with diverse colleagues tend to be more adaptable and resilient. This adaptability allows them to pursue job opportunities across multiple sectors without the constant fear of unemployment, thereby fostering a greater sense of job security. Additionally, multitalented workers are essential contributors to technological advancements and economic growth. Their ability to think creatively and approach problems from different angles drives innovation and progress within industries.

 

In conclusion, the enthusiasm for higher income and the pursuit of new knowledge are primary motivations behind individuals' frequent changes in occupation. I firmly believe that this trend represents a positive development, as it not only enhances the employability and satisfaction of workers but also contributes to the overall progress of society.

7

Yaser
Yaser

Topic

The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012.

#184940

Writing

   The information specified in the line graph illustrates the accessibility of different sweeteners in the USA over a forty-six-year period between 1966 and 2012, measured in pounds per person. At first glance, it is evident that the figures for Edible Syrups and Honey remained almost stable, while the curve for Refined Cane and Beet Sugars witnessed a general decline over the timeframe. Additionally, there was a gradual increase in Corn Sweeteners and Total curves.

   Looking at Honey and Edible Syrups, the figures for these categories started at nearly 13 and 10 pounds in 1966, respectively, and finally, finished at almost the same values in 2011. In addition, the curve for Edible Syrup was always under the curve of Honey.

   Turning to the figure for Corn Sweeteners, it started at almost 18 pounds, then saw a gradual rise for the next twenty years, reaching 60 pounds in 1986. Also, it peaked at 80 pounds in 2000 and then decreased slightly to 60 pounds in 2011.

   In contrast to other sweeteners, Refined Cane and Beet Sugars saw a gradual decline in the first third of the timeframe and then remained constant for the rest of the period. It is worth noting that it started at about 100 pounds in 1966 and finished at 63 pounds in 2011, which was the highest availability amount in this year.

7

Fatemeh
Fatemeh

Topic

The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012.

#24572814

Writing

The graph demonstrates how much sweetener was available in the USA over a 15-year peiod. 

 

Overall, it is clear that various types of sweeteners, including corn sweeteners, became more available within this time period, while this figure for refined cane and beet sugars was decremental. Honey and edible syrup remained relatively steady throughout this time.

 

Focusing on plant-derived sweeteners, approximately 18 and 100 pounds of corn sweeteners and refined cane and beet sugars were available per person in 1966, respectively. Although refined cane witnessed a significant decline to 60 in 1986, this figure for corn sweeteners rose considerably to reach the same value. Following this point, with the exception of a marginal increase of about 20 pounds for corn sweeteners, the availability of both levelled off until 2011.

 

Looking at honey and edible syrup, almost 10 pounds per capita became available at the beginning of this period, following a stationary trajectory within this time with minor fluctuations.

 

Turning to total amount of sweeteners accessible for US citizens, about 130 pounds were available per capita in 1996. This figure fluctuated slightly, reaching a high of 156 in 2001 before experiencing a marginal fall to return to its value at the beginning.

7

Elina
Elina

Topic

The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012.

#24563158

Writing

The graph provides information about the per capita availability of sweeteners  in the United States of America during the period of 46 years( from 1966 to 2012 )


Overall, the total amount of sweeteners peaked in 1999, largely due to a rise in corn sweeteners, before declining steadily. Refined sugars’ availability saw a significant decrease over time, while honey and edible syrups remained stable.


In 1966, refined cane and beet sugars were the most commonly used sweeteners in the USA with approximately 100 pounds per person annually ,in comparison with corn sweeteners, honey and edible syrups, which accounted for less than 20 pounds each.

 By 1985, the availability of refined sugars had declined to around 65 pounds, while corn sweeteners rose sharply to match this figure. In contrast, honey and edible syrups’ share in the market  remained relatively unchanged throughout the 46 years, fluctuating at minimal levels. 


Corn sweeteners reached their peak in 1999 at almost 80 pounds per person but declined to 65 pounds by 2011.Meanwhile, refined cane and beet sugars availability saw a gradual decrease overall, but by 2011, their availability exceeded that of corn sweeteners, stabilizing at around 70 pounds.

7

Fatemeh
Fatemeh

Topic

The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012.

#24567100

Writing

The line graph illustrates the availability of different sweeteners in a specific country between 1966 and 2012.

 

Overall, the total and corn sweeteners witnessed a significant increase, while refined cane and beet sugars witnessed a drop consistently. In addition, edible syrups and honey were the least stable rise.

 

On the one hand, in 1966, refined cane and beet sugars were the majority of sweeteners, at around 100 pounds per person; this was around 50 times as much as corn sweeteners. After two decades, the former plummeted to around 60, whereas the latter surged and surpassed refined cane and beet sugars at 60. Toward the end of the period, corn sweeteners after reaching a peak, sweeteners fell to under 60, while refined cane and beet sugars almost remained unchanged, at 60. Notably, refined cane and beet sugar retaining in the top positions, and also the gap between refined cane and corn sweeteners is closer.

 

On the other hand, honey and edible syrups only contribute to 10 pounds of the total. These figures remained unchanged over the period. The total availability of sweeteners consistently increased, reaching around 150 in the 1990s, before declining to approximately 130 pounds in 2012.

7

Farhad
Farhad

Topic

The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012.

#224198

Writing

The line chart compares the four sweeteners’ availability over a period of 56 years in the USA.

Overall, we can see that that the total amount of sweeteners increased slightly over this period. It is also clear that honey and edible syrups remained almost stable, while others saw dramatic changes.

In 1966, refined cane and beet sugars were by far the main source of sweeteners by roughly 100 pounds, while the others were less than 20 pounds per person. Its value started falling down by 40 pounds, whereas the corn sweeteners saw a steep rise to overtake it by 60 pounds in 1986. In the following years, refined cane and beet sugars have small changes, but corn sweeteners rose slightly to 80 pounds and returned back to less than refined cane and beet sugars.

By contrast, edible syrups by near to zero amounts were the lowest amount in each year. With a similar stable trend, honey was the second lowest usage from 1966 to 2011. Turning to the total amount, it is noticeable that it saw a 30 pounds rising to reach it highest value of 160 in 2000, and then following a decrease to level of 140 in 2011.

7

Mohamad
Mohamad

Topic

The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012.

#242239

Writing

The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012.

 

The chart underneath gives information about the assortment of sweeteners in America from 1996 to 2012. By and large, refined cane and beet sugar dominated the showcase, taken after by corn sweeteners and honey.

Overall, whereas corn sweeteners expanded continuously amid those 46 for a long time, refined cane and beet sugars diminished in that period. Hence, honey and edible syrups appeared with the steady lines.

Concurring to the chart, first, the total sweeteners that Americans utilized hit about 128. At that point, it expanded decently and came to the vertex of 155 in 1999. However, it decreased to some degree to about 135 in 2011. Refined can and beet sugars, the sugar in the USA, scored fairly beneath 98 in 1966 after that, it developed somewhat to roughly 100 in 1971. All things considered, it declined altogether to generally 60 in 1985. From that point, its number was about consistent until 2011.

From 1966 to 1986, refined cane and beet sugars did not fluctuate much, representing around 60 pounds per person until 2006, and slightly increasing until 2011 to around 70 pounds per person. In contrast, corn sweeteners were growing significantly and started to fall in 2006, with around 70 pounds per person, and they ended up at 60 pounds per person in 2011. Following the previous years, honey and edible syrup remained at less than 20 pounds per person until 2011.