Writing

The picture depicts the stages by which aluminum drink cans are reprocessed.
Overall, this process is composed of four main stages, beginning with the drinking machine and ending with the recycling of aluminum and the making of new drink cans in four stages at a recycling center.
The process begins when the drink machine is filled with empty cans. At this point, wasted cans are transferred to a collection center, and then they are completely emptied in a special container before being divided into two general categories: aluminum and steel. After the cans are categorized, aluminum cans are conveyed to a recycling center. At the factory, the cans are pressed and turned into cubes.
After that, the cube packs are moved to an aluminum recycling plant, and they are melted down at an intense temperature. The molten aluminum is sprayed into a bucket, at which point new aluminum is shaped into a same-size block. Following this, the blocks are transformed into a roll of aluminum. The process ends with new cans being made from the aluminum roll and  moved to a vending machine.

Writing

The diagram details the stages of recycling aluminium drink cans. Overall, it is clear that this circular process comprised of three main stages , starting with initial collection, making new cans out of old aluminium in a recycling facility and ending with putting the new cans in a vending machine. 

 

The first part commences with sorting and collecting the aluminium cans from a trash bin at the collection centre. After this, the cans are transported to the recycling centre. This is the place where the second stage begins. First , the old aluminium is melted in a big pot, after that a brand new aluminum is shaped by putting the liquid form in a rectangular bar. Following this, now the bars are solid, the new aluminium is converted to aluminium roll . Finally , a stack of new cans are made from the roll and ready to transport. 

After making and packaging the new cans, they are sent to their designated locations, which includes drink machines. 

 

 

Writing

 

 
people have many different views about how development of technology affected on our interaction. on the one hand some individuals argue that this improvement has enhanced our capability for communicate with others person. on the another hand they said this advancement lead people to isolation and depression. in my opinion the advantage of this trend exceed the drawback.

one main reason why some people hold this view is that modern technology make communication extremely easier than past. additionally another of paramount important thing is that this development provide instant communication, in other words it is no limited by time and location. also users can make a call with someone as soon as possible without no effort. furthermore this phenomenon has a significant impact on how our live and consequently lead people to adapt a fast pace lifestyle. for instance in COVID 19 lockdown period individual have to stay in home for 1 months period and without social media this situation would unbearable. as a result this kind of communication play a crucial role on our interaction.

despite these advantages, there are also few downsides. firstly reduce face to face contact. people are rely on calls and they find it unnecessary to talk with someone by natural interaction. hence made them depression and anti social. for example recently in montreal a sample of 20 children verify this topic. children without a phone are more willing to talk and they are try to break the ice with teachers and researchers than them peers who have a cellphone. they are more extroverted and energetic. secondly every person need affection, if it is lacking they lead to isolation. also affection cannot be transmitted via smartphones and social media, it just possible by talking face to face.

in conclusion, while smartphone and technology has a impact on our communication and mental health, overall seems to me the beneficial aspects are more significant compared to the disadvantages.

 
اگر بخوای، می‌تونم همین متن رو یک نسخه با اصلاح جزئی گرامر و روان‌سازی بدون تغییر معنی هم آماده کنم تا نمره آیلتس بالاتری بگیره.

میخوای آماده کنم؟
 
You said:
حالا نقطه گذاری و پاراگراف بندی کن
 
ChatGPT said:
حتماً! اینجا متن شما با نقطه‌گذاری و پاراگراف‌بندی استاندارد آماده شده است، بدون تغییر معنی یا کلمات:

 
People have many different views about how development of technology affected our interaction. On the one hand, some individuals argue that this improvement has enhanced our capability to communicate with other people. On the other hand, they said this advancement leads people to isolation and depression. In my opinion, the advantages of this trend exceed the drawbacks.

One main reason why some people hold this view is that modern technology makes communication extremely easier than in the past. Additionally, another thing of paramount importance is that this development provides instant communication; in other words, it is not limited by time and location. Also, users can make a call with someone as soon as possible without any effort. Furthermore, this phenomenon has a significant impact on how we live and consequently leads people to adapt a fast-paced lifestyle. For instance, during the COVID-19 lockdown period, individuals had to stay at home for a one-month period, and without social media, this situation would be unbearable. As a result, this kind of communication plays a crucial role in our interaction.

Despite these advantages, there are also a few downsides. Firstly, reduced face-to-face contact. People rely on calls and they find it unnecessary to talk with someone through natural interaction. Hence, this makes them depressed and antisocial. For example, recently in Montreal, a sample of 20 children verified this topic. Children without a phone are more willing to talk, and they try to break the ice with teachers and researchers more than their peers who have a cellphone. They are more extroverted and energetic. Secondly, every person needs affection; if it is lacking, it can lead to isolation. Also, affection cannot be transmitted via smartphones and social media; it is only possible by talking face-to-face.

In conclusion, while smartphones and technology have an impact on our communication and mental health, overall it seems to me that the beneficial aspects are more significant compared to the disadvantages.

Writing

Some individuals believe that the state must allocate funding to public transportation facilities. However, others think it’s more beneficial for the government to spend money on the development of roads and highways' infrastructures. From my perspective, although many people cannot use public modes of transport and private cars are convenient for them, the enhancement of public transportation is more important in urban areas.

 

In large cities, using means of transport can be a good option for citizens. These facilities are cost-efficient and time-saving. Encouraging people to use these transportation facilities is pivotal in rural areas because of their impact on mitigating carbon footprint and reducing in traffic congestion. In that case, the state must invest money in expanding and improving public transportation infrastructure to make it available for the vast majority of people. For instance, in metropolitan areas with extensive modes of transport, more people can commute to work and move through the town, and this can promote citizens' awareness of public transport's benefits.

 

On the other hand, some critics argue that the budget should be allocated to road maintenance. Some people cannot use buses and the metro and they have to stick to their private cars. Poor road and highway conditions may have some detrimental impacts on drivers' lives. One notable example of this can be seen on roads with the most car accidents. On poorly maintained roads, the number of accidents is significantly higher than on well-maintained roads. Moreover, many old roads are insufficient for the population in big cities. Roads and streets must get renovated because the number of cars has increased and it can cause gridlock on old roads. So, improving modern highways and building well-constructed roads can have a positive impact on road safety and reduce traffic on them.

 

In conclusion, both public transportation and roads require improvement and renovation due to their benefits for traffic and road safety. However, because of the environmental impacts of advanced public transportation, I think it should be the main priority of government investment.

Writing

Some people believe that governments should invest in public transportation, while others, including me, argue that improving roads and highways is more important. 
Some think that governments do not spend enough money on public transportation services, as the number of public vehicles does not match the number of people using them. For example, nowadays, there are long waiting lines at taxi and bus stations, caused by traffic congestion and limited public transport. Governments should allocate a budget to purchase more cars. Furthermore, many vehicles frequently break down due to various reasons, such as age and poor road quality, so they should be replaced with new ones.  
However, others, including myself, believe that improving roads and highways is more important, as the main cause of traffic congestion is not the number of vehicles but the condition and design of the roads. For instance, in the Tehran metropolitan area, the width of the highways is not sufficient for the number of cars they carry daily. In some areas, the roads even become narrower, which causes accidents and leads to traffic congestion. In addition, in many cities, uneven and damaged roads cause frequent breakdowns, not only for private cars but also for public vehicles such as buses and taxis. Since these vehicles operate on the same roads every day, they suffer even more from road damage. As a result, the government must spend a considerable amount of money on repairing and maintaining public transport vehicles. Therefore, improving roads and highways would reduce these costs and strengthen the transportation system as a whole.
In conclusion, although some argue that governments should invest more in public transportation, others, including me, believe that improving roads and highways is more crucial for reducing traffic problems and ensuring road safety

Writing

Improving a nation’s transport infrastructure is crucial for economic development and citizens’ quality of life. Some argue that governments should invest more heavily in public transportation systems, while others believe the priority should be upgrading roads and highways. Although expanding road networks may ease traffic congestion temporarily, I believe that investing in public transport provides more sustainable and long‑term benefits.

On the one hand, improving roads and highways is often seen as vital for supporting private transportation and commercial activities. Better roads can reduce travel time for car owners and facilitate the delivery of goods across regions. For instance, in developing countries where logistics networks are underdeveloped, smoother and wider highways can directly stimulate trade and tourism. Moreover, road construction creates short‑term employment opportunities and signals visible progress, which can be politically favorable. Proponents also argue that since most people still rely on private vehicles, enhancing roads ensures convenience for the majority.

On the other hand, investing in public transportation systems—such as buses, metro lines, and railways—can tackle long‑term problems more effectively. Firstly, high‑quality public transport reduces traffic congestion by offering affordable alternatives to private cars, leading to fewer vehicles on the road. This, in turn, lowers pollution levels and contributes to a cleaner environment. Secondly, efficient public transport promotes social equality, as it benefits citizens who cannot afford private vehicles. Finally, large cities like Tokyo and London show that reliable metro and bus networks are key to economic efficiency, enabling millions of people to commute daily with minimal delay.

In my opinion, while maintaining and upgrading roads is necessary, the government’s main focus should be to expand and modernize the public transport system. Roads can only be widened to a certain extent, whereas well‑planned buses and railways reduce traffic, pollution, and fuel consumption for decades. Therefore, prioritizing investment in public transport is both economically and environmentally wise.

In conclusion, although improving roads and highways provides short‑term convenience and trade benefits, enhancing public transportation offers greater long‑term value. Governments should thus allocate more funds to developing efficient, accessible, and eco‑friendly public transit systems.

Writing

People’s opinions differ as to whether governments should invest in public transportation or whether it should be spent on the improvement of roads and highways. While both are beneficial for a nation's development, I think allocating a significant portion to making reliable transportation comes with long-term benefits.

There are quite a few merits in investing in public transit. The primary reason is the reduced traffic congestion, meaning that a robust public transit system encourages fewer people to use private cars, which reduces the number of personal vehicles on the roads, which in turn reduces traffic jams and could lead to a fall in air pollution because of a decline in carbon emissions if the adequate public transport system is replaced. With fewer automobiles also on the roads, the fuel consumption decreases; that itself might help officials to save money for more investment. Moreover, high-quality public transit can be a catalyst for efficient urban development and attract investment, with residential property values near transit hubs increasing significantly. It improves overall accessibility to job markets and services for both drivers and non-drivers, thus increasing economic productivity.

However, developing and maintaining highways and roads is vital for a country. First and foremost, in places like rural or suburban areas where there is no reliable public transit, commuting to work and other places is preferred to be done by individual cars needing well-developed roads. In addition, roads and highways are essential for national supply chains, enabling the efficient transport of goods, services, and materials, which reduces freight delivery costs and supports businesses across the country. A conglomerate, for example, sending all of its products around the country in case of lowering the cost of services, chooses to send them with its lorry and trucks. This vast network of roads requires ongoing maintenance and improvement to ensure safety and functionality.

In conclusion, while some advocate for investing in road and highway infrastructure, I believe that if the government spends a noticeable amount of taxes on public transportation, the positive points outweigh the investment in roads.

Writing

In the current climate, transportation funding has become a contentious issue. While it is claimed that officials should dedicate a larger portion of their budget to public transportation, I maintain that developing roads is of greater importance.

 

Supporters of public transportation offer a number of justifications. Firstly, the number of citizens using the mass transit systems is significant. Many individuals may prioritize this system for various reasons, such as its environmental friendliness. For instance, it has been shown in a scientific article that nearly half of German community members tend to use taxis rather than their private cars. More importantly, public transit requires improvement in a large number of nations. According to a research project conducted at the University of California, just over 55 percent of buses are worn out on average. Consequently, it is more reasonable for governments to invest more in public vehicles.

 

Turning to the other group, some argue that roads need more attention. First of all, a considerable number of individuals tend to benefit from their own cars instead of buses or taxis. For example, it has been reported that more than two-thirds of workers prioritize their private cars over public vehicles to commute to their workplaces. Thus, allocating more money to highways can be more beneficial to employees, who make up a significant part of a community. Furthermore, highways are common to both private and many public vehicles. In other words, improving roads can benefit a large number of public vehicles, such as buses and taxis, as well as private cars.

 

In conclusion, I contend that spending more money on roads than on the public transportation system is more reasonable due to several reasons, including the popularity of cars and the advantages to both options.  

Writing

The diagram illustrates the six stages involved in recycling used glass bottles and reproducing new ones from waste materials.

Overall, the process is a continuous cycle beginning with the disposal of glass bottles into recycling bins and ending with their delivery to supermarkets and shops for reuse.

In the first stage, used bottles are collected in designated recycling bins. These are then transported by lorries to a treatment plant, where the second stage takes place. At this point, the glass waste is sorted and prepared for cleaning. Following this, in the third stage, the bottles are washed and sterilised using specialised washing machines to ensure that all impurities are removed.

Once cleaned, the bottles move on to the fourth stage, during which they are crushed and then melted in high-temperature furnaces. The resulting molten glass is transferred to moulding machines in the fifth stage, where it is shaped into new bottles. In the final stage, these newly formed bottles are packed and transported by delivery trucks to supermarkets and retailers, where they are ready for use again. After consumption, the bottles are once more discarded into recycling bins, allowing the cycle to repeat.

Writing

We can see how used glass is recycled to produce brand new glass containers. The diagram indicates a natural circle consisting of six distinct stages. During this process, raw materials should undergo some changes that can be used again.

At the first stage second-hand glass is collected to begin the process. The collected glass is delivered to treatment plant to purify chemical residues and be prepared for the third phase which offers more advanced hygienic output. This phase is dedicated to cleansing as well as sterilizing, equipped with special machines. 

The fourth stage of recycling, the glass is crushed and melted, and the resulting molten glass can finally be molded to create new items. However, another remaining step, delivery, ships them to wherever is required, before being recycled again.

This process repeats itself again and again, and each glass of bottle might be reused for countless times. While the first half of recycling is generally allocated to purification and melting functions, the second of which is connected to molding, transferring items, and reusage.