Writing

In recent years, food waste has become a growing global concern, especially in restaurants and shops where large quantities of edible food are thrown away every single day. Many factors should be blamed for this circumstance such as overproduction and oversupply. This issue can be tackled through various practical measures. However, the success of these solutions relies heavily on individuals becoming more responsible. 
Overproduction is known as one of the major reasons for food waste in restaurants and shops. To address meeting unpredictable customer demand and prevent running out of popular items, many businesses prepare to stock more food than necessary. This often can result in significant amount of not being sold or consumed, which ultimately leads to waste. Moreover, strict aesthetic standards can play a vital role. It is widely believed that people associate appearance with quality. That is why many shops discard items that look unattractive, even if they are still fine to eat.
In order to address this issue, several solutions can be implemented. To elaborate on, companies can adopt “ugly food” campaigns that motivate customers to buy imperfect but still edible items, helping to reduce waste and increase awareness. Another effective approach is better inventory and stock management, where businesses use forecasting tools to prevent oversupply and ensure food is used before its spoils.  
In conclusion, food waste in restaurants and shops is a serious problem driven by factors such as overproduction, poor planning, and aesthetic standards. This problem not only causes economic loss but also harms the environment. While there are several useful solutions such as improving inventory management and promoting food donations, their success largely depends on greater responsibility from both consumers and businesses.

Writing

The given line graph provides us with information regarding the percentage of earnings spent on petrol by citizens with various income levels in the United States and Britain.

Overall, a significantly large amount of people's expenses is dedicated to vehicle fuel by people in the United States, with an exception of the high-income group who seem to use less petrol for their private means of transportation than their British counterparts.

People who live on low salaries in England pay the negligible amount of less than 1% of their wages on fuel, while the same group in the United States gives nearly 4% of their budget to petrol providers. The same pattern applies to citizens living by an average payment, who have higher amounts of payments on fuel in United State. We see an increase in the English middle-class group's petrol cost, although it remains lower than same class's rate in the US. 

This trend begins to alternate when we look at the payment profile of the people who are economically more powerful: in the US a lower proportion of their expenditure is allocated to petrol, while in Britain opulent population's payment on petrol seem to be roughly 1% higher.

Writing

Dear Sir or Madam,

I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing, as requested, to provide feedback on the cookery class which I attended last month at your school, and kindly request you to offer another course.

I am pleased to express my satisfaction regarding the course. Everything about the class was perfect. However, the best thing to me was the instructor. I found her very knowledgeable and competent. Her teaching style was professional and easy to follow, enabling everyone to take notes and keep up with the class.

After joining this cooking course, I have been preparing almost all of my family’s meals on a daily basis. Before this course, we used to eat processed and pre-prepared food, while now my family only want to have my homemade dishes.

I would like to suggest that your institute offer a bakery class, which covers baking different breads and cakes. I am more than sure a large number of my neighbors would also take this class.

Thank you for your time and attention.

Yours faithfully

Paris Djalal

Writing

The graph shows the percentage of petrol usage by people of various social statuses, from the poorest to the richest, in two eminent countries: the USA and the UK.  
      Overall, the consumption of petrol is an indispensable issue, particularly in two well-known countries: the USA and the UK. Regarding the graph, the amount of income that people spend on fuel in the USA is higher than in the UK. 
      According to the graph, in the USA, more than 4% of poor people's income is spent on fuel; moreover, this process increases sharply and moves over 5% as it gets closer to the people of middle-income. However, in the USA, the procedure of petrol expenditure decreases as people get richer. This gradual decline continues to less than 3% when it comes to rich people.   
     Nevertheless, even though the amount of income spent on fuel in the UK is lower than in the USA, in the UK, petrol consumption has a rising trend based on people’s income. It means the more people get rich, the more money they spend on fuel. Therefore, we can see that less than 1% of the income of poor people is spent on fuel. Yet, it rises gradually by over 2% as it gets near the area of people with middle income. Again, this movement continues to augment until it surpasses 3% in the rich people's area.

Writing

The given chart presents a comparison respecting the income rate spent on fuel by people in two countries. The United States and the United Kingdom are based on social class.

Overall, Americans have spent more income on fuel than the British in all social classes except for the upper class. While the poorest individuals had the most proportion in the US, the richest did so in the UK. Moreover, whereas the UK experienced an upward trend, the US did so conversely.

As regards the US, the income rate spent on petrol initially was under 4% for the lower class. It had decreased to around 5% after it had gone up notably to just over a twentieth, hitting its peak. Afterward, the percentage gradually dropped to less than 3% for the most affluent individuals.

In contrast, regarding the UK, the percent of income spent on fuel originally was a trifling figure before it rose slowly to 4% for middle-income individuals, its highest percent. Then it continued unchangeable except at the end of the trend, when it declined to almost 3% for the richest individuals.

Writing

The line graph compares the amount of money citizens of the United States and the United Kingdom spend on petrol in terms of their income.

Overall, american people spend more money on petrol compared to the UK. However, the richest people of United Kingdom use more petrol than the americans. Middle to upper-class citizens of both countries spend approximately an equal amount on petrol.

It can be seen that people with lower salaries in the United Kingdom spend almost 0% of their income on the fuel. However, this percentage grows moderately as the wealth of individuals increases. This rising trend continues untill the higher middle-income people with almost 4% of their total income. The amount of money spent falls suddenly among the more wealthy people in this country, with just above 3%.

By contrast, the poorest people in america spend an average of 4 to 5% of their salaries on petrol. However, this proportion experiences a slow decrease as their wealth goes higher. The richest people in america spend much less of their money on this sort of fuel compared to the richest in the UK, at around 2.5%.

Writing

In numerous countries the amount of food that restaurants and shops waste is substantial. I believe, mass production, distribution, and unpredicted number of customers can be three excellent reasons for their occurrence, which I believe can be reduced with the power of Artificial Intelligence.

To keep track of how much food a town requires is significantly difficult. Therefore, companies produce food more than necessary. Then, the products are distributed to various parts of the town. However, population of different parts of the same town may differ from each other. So, some shops may sell more of the same product, and others may have to dispose of the expired goods. This is the same for the restaurants. The number of customers can differ day to day. Consequently, a technology with the capability to store important data, such as the ones mentioned above, would help companies that produce food, distributors, and those who put the food on the table for people to reduce food waste.

This is where AI powered systems become useful. AI models can store data, analyze them, and extract information from them. Therefore, are a proper choice for this issue. Data and statistics of each day’s number of sales and the amount of waste in a year can be given to this system. The system then can predict the amount of food the company and the restaurants will sell. For instance, the amount of goods bought in a particular part of town, the amount of food ordered on special days such as valentine’s day or any other holiday can be the data that help this model to predict the sales rate of the future, leading to less amount of food being wasted.

To conclude, many of todays countries are experiencing the same issue of wasting much resources that will find their way into dumpsters, due to mass production, weak distribution system, and the unavailable data about the number of customers. However, with the help of AI-powered systems, this issue can be countered, as the model is capable of storing data and extracting information to predict future occurrences.

Writing

Over the past decades, people’s tendency to live alone or in nuclear families has increased significantly. In my point of view, people need to have more freedom, and achieving autonomy might be some considerable reasons for this growing trend. I believe it can be a positive trend due to they can more seriously concentrate on their personal ambitions and aims. 

To begin with, one of the most significant reasons for rising the number of people who prefer to live alone or in a close-knit family would be their inclination to live independently and without others’ interference. In other word, when people live together, their decisions directly or indirectly affect other family members' lives, thus they have to make wise decisions and consider the consequences of their decisions on others. Therefore, their freedom will be overwhelmed notably. By contrast, living alone provides them with the opportunity to make snap and spontaneous decisions and enhances their freedom.  

I believe being alone or living in a nuclear family can be beneficial in some aspects. This is because people have more time and budget to focus on their aims and dreams compared to when they were members of a large family, thus their success in their working or educational lives is enhanced notably. When individuals live in an extended family, they cannot dedicate all of the family’s income and time to themselves, and they should consider other family members. As a result, the family’s resources are divided among all family members.  

In conclusion, although people in the past would like to live socially, these days the preponderance of people prefer to live alone. Reaching freedom might be one of the most considerable reasons for growing this tendency, and in my opinion, this trend can be advantageous for people’s personal development. 

Writing

The line graph illustrates the amount (percentage of their salary), that the United States and the United Kingdom residents spend on fuel in three different income categories. Overall, the trend in the United States shows a peak within the lower-income bracket, followed by a gradual decline in fuel expenditure among higher earners. In contrast, the United Kingdom displays a steady upward trend that flattens at the top income level.

In the United Kingdom, the poorest dedicate about 0.5 percent of their income to fuel expenses. In addition, this number reaches 2.5 percent in middle-income group. Moreover, this amount stops around 4 percent among richest people classification.

In the United States, the people in poorest category pay a higher percent of their income in comparison to the average and high salary receivers. The poorest pay about 4 percent of their income, whereas this percent grows to over 5% of their income in the middle of the lower-income range, which is the highest percent spent on fuel in the United States. Following that we can see as the income group increases the amount they spend from their salary decreases. Consequently, the percent that the richest people pay from their income is 2% which is the lowest percent in the graph shown for the United States.

Writing

The line graph represents the amount spent on fuel as a percentage of income by individuals in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Generally speaking, it is evident that in the United States, the poorest individuals spend the most on petrol, while the richest individuals spend the least. In contrast, in the United Kingdom, this trend is reversed compared to the United States.

When comparing the two line graphs, we can see that the poorest individuals in the United Kingdom spend the least on fuel, at just under 1% of their income. However, this figure experiences a significant increase, reaching 4% of income for the richest individuals. In contrast, in the United States, the poorest individuals initially spend 4% of their income, but this figure suddenly increases to just over 5% before experiencing a significant decrease to 2% for the richest individuals. Moreover, in the United States, middle-income individuals spend the least on fuel relative to those in the United Kingdom.