Writing

Dear Ali,

I hope you’re doing well. It’s been ages since the last time we met. It’s wonderful news that you’ve been accepted into a course at the University of Toronto. I’m sure you’ll make the most of it.

As you know, my course was full-time and I needed to attend the classes every single day. So, I had to live in the dormitory on the campus to be close to my faculty as well as to avoid commuting.

However, since your course is part-time and you need to go to university just twice a week, I believe staying at the dorm isn’t a wise decision for you. You’d better find a shared two-bedroom flat or a studio apartment. It’s a more affordable option than the university residence and gives you more freedom. Plus, there are more things to do outside campus in your free time.

The best way to find a place or someone to share is through online websites. I’ll send you some links.

Just a tip, make sure the rent includes utility bills, especially internet and electricity. Since in Toronto these expenses may cost you more than the rent itself.

Let me know if you have any further questions.

Best of luck,

Parisa 

 

 

Writing

Dear Arash,

 

I'm writing to let you know about my experience when I was living at the university to give you some advice and guide you.

 

 

I lived there for four years. It is located in the northeast of the campus. It is also a large building with five stories and sixty rooms. I stayed there with two of my best classmates.

 

 

If you would like to obtain the best room with a spectacular and gorgeous view, I recommend you contact the person in charge of the accommodation, whose name is Mr. Kamali. He has been a highly regarded and prominent instructor and now is retired. We have known each other. Besides, I can give you his phone number to contact. He is a sympathetic person and will help you with any issues.

 

 

Be careful because sometimes, new students do not know what to do to find a place to live. They waste their time, and after this, places will be full.They also become familiar with unknown or strange students who are untrustworthy and unreliable.Therefore, they will face complications. Avoid these mistakes.

 

 

Anyway, I eagerly anticipate your message.

 

Best wishes.

Reza

Writing

The line graph depicts the unemployment rates of two distinct areas over four quarters of 2012. The data suggest that urban areas experienced less unemployment, while people living on the outskirts of the city lack more job opportunities. 

Concerning the cities, the trend for unemployed Australians was significantly lower compared to that of areas out of the cities. It started slightly above 2 percent in the first three months of the year, then grew noticeably to around 4 percent in the next quarter. After that nearly in the middle of the year, the trend saw a sudden decline by around two percent; however, by the end of 2012, it increased dramatically, with a marginal decline, to just near 5%.

Suburban residents, by contrast, experienced more job scarcity. At the beginning of the year, the percentage was well above 6 percent, which was the highest rate reported in graph. In the subsequent months, the figure saw a steady downward trend, with approximately 4.5%. After passing two quarters in the year, it rose gradually and leveled out in the last months, with 5 %.     

Writing

The given line graph depicts the rate of redundancy among rural and urban areas in Australia during the year 2012.

Overall, it is obvious that the percentage of unemployment had a downward trend within first two decades of the 2012 which followed by a slight rise in other months while the same trend had significant fluctuations during the mentioned period of time.

 

Looking again at rural areas, within the first two quarters of the year, the percentage of unemployed individuals was on a downward trajectory from nearly 7% at the beginning of 2012 to 4.5% after the second quarter of the same year. Between the second and third quarter, the rate fluctuated mildly until it almost remained steady around 5% at the end of the year.

 

Moving on to the urban areas, the joblessness rate reached a peak in the middle of second quarter of 2012 with about 4%. By the third quarter of 2012, the rate bottomed out from 4% to just 2%. Then between the last two quarters, the rate had a wild swing and became to the end with around 5%.

Writing

The provided line chart illustrates a comprehensive comparative analysis of the joblessness crisis among Australian people in two distinctive regions, rural and urban areas, in four sections of 2012 in percentile changes. 

Following careful analysis, it is evident that in 2012, the career gap rate in rural areas experienced a downward trend, whereas the trend for joblessness in urban areas was upward. Meanwhile, the maximum value in the given figure was recorded for rural areas in the initial period of 2012. Notably, at the end of 2012, the fourth quarter of the year, the percentage of rural and urban unemployment nearly met each other's values. 

As shown in the given figure, it is highlighted that in 2012, the highest rate of workforce displacement was experienced by Australian residents in rural areas in the first quarter of the year, hitting nearly 6.5%. Then, this value steadily dropped between the second and third quarters of the year, reaching its lowest point at around 4.5%. In contrast, the unemployment rate started at just over 2% during this period and climbed to 4% by the end of the year's second quarter. It is noteworthy that in the third quarter of the year, while the value for rural areas rose to over 5%, the joblessness rate in urban areas witnessed a sharp decrease, reaching the lowest point in the figure at 2%. In rural areas, the percentage of employment absence fell by approximately 0.5% and reached 5% after a slight increase in the fourth quarter of 2012. Furthermore, at the end of the year, the value for urban areas increased to nearly the same percentage as in rural areas, indicating almost an equal unemployment rate in both regions. Before this increase, the value for urban areas demonstrated fluctuation, rising to 4% in the middle of the third and fourth quarter of the year and falling below 4%.  

Writing

The line graph illustrates the unemployment rate in two different areas, namely rural and urban in Australia in 2012. Overall, it can clearly be seen that the rate of rural unemployment accounted for the highest rate in comparison with urban areas. Similarly, both lines indicate considerable fluctuations simultaneously.

Unlike the rate of rural employment experiencing a drop from well below 7% to just below 6% in the first quarter of 2012, the rate of metropolitan unemployment followed a climb from about 2.5% to around 3%. Moreover, it continued to 4% in the middle of the second quarter and then fell by approximately 0.5%, while the rate of rural areas recorded a steady reduction from just under 6% to around 4.5%.

In the third of 2012, after a sharp decrease the rate of rural unemployment increased to well above 5%. Nonetheless, the rate of metropolis shows a drastic fall by 1%. Additionally, urban rate hit the lowest percentage which was 2% in the middle of the third quarter and later increased to around 4%. However, rural unemployment rate recorded marginal variations approximately 1% between third and fourth of 2012.

Writing

The line graph provides data on the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012.

Overall, while the unemployment rate in rural areas was far higher than in urban areas throughout the year, the rates in both regions were almost equal by the end of the period.

According to the graph, the unemployment rate in rural areas started at approximately 6.5% at the beginning. Then it declined substantially, hitting a low of around 4.5% in the third quarter of the year. Subsequently, it rose gradually, reaching nearly 5.5% by the end of the third quarter of the year. After a slight decrease, the rate remained unchanged at roughly 5% by the end of the period. 

In contrast, the unemployment rate in urban areas stood at just over 2% at the beginning of the year. The rate then experienced a significant increase, peaking at almost 4% in mid-year. During the third three months of the year, the percentage fell sharply, recovering to around 2%. Over the last quarter of the year, the joblessness rate grew dramatically with some fluctuations, reaching nearly 5% by the end of the year.

Writing

 The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012.
 
 The chart illustrates the unemployment rate in rural and urban areas of Australia over the four quarters of 2012.
 
Overall, there is fluctuation in the data. However, countryside zones had the highest rate at the beginning, whereas the figures for urban areas were generally less than rural areas. Also, the gap between them had narrowed and both rates became almost equal by the end of the period.
 
Looking at the rural areas, the rate stood at around 6.5% which was the most notable unemployment rate in the timeframe. Following this, a rapid decline was seen until the second quarter, around 4.5%. Throughout the year, the graph indicated slight changes to 5% at the end of the period.
 
In metropolitan zones, residents who lived in urban areas witnessed the lowest rate of unemployment, around 2%. Also, the graph rose noticeably during half of the year to 4%. In contrast, in the third quarter of the year a significant drop to 2% was recorded. Finally, a line graph showed a steady climb to around 5% which was near rural proportion.   
 
 
    

Writing

The line graph illustrates unemployment rates in Australia in 2012 in rural and urban areas.

Overall, it is clear that while the rate of unemployment in rural areas witnessed a gradual decrease, it was the opposite in urban areas. Furthermore, the percentage of unemploymant rate in rural areas was always more than in urban areas.

At first, the percentage of unemployment situation in rural areas was near 7%. It was around three times more than this rate in urban areas. After falling dramatically, the percentage of people who do not have a job in rural increased gradually to around 5% in approximately the third of year. The opposite happened in urban areas. The percentage of unemployment rate in urban areas increased dramatically before falling to around 2%, where it was from the beginning.

From the third of year to the end of year, rural areas witness a flactuataion around 5% in the percentage of unemployment rate. In contrast, despite a minimal fall, the percentage of people who do not have a job in urban areas increased dramatically, which stood near 5%, which was slightly less than in urban areas.

Writing

The given line chart compares rural and urban unemployment rate in Australia in 2012.

Overall, it is clear from the graph that while the unemployment rate in rural areas was more than urban areas throughout 2012, the proportion of people who do not have a job increased in urban areas during the fourth quarter of the year 2012.

As is shown, in the first quarter of 2012, the proportion of unemployed people who settled in urban areas was 2% in Australia, which almost doubled by the second quarter of 2012. Then, it decreased in the third quarter of 2012 and stood at 2%. In contrast, in the fourth quarter of 2012, the percentage of unemployed people who lived in urban regions rose and reached just under 5%. Meanwhile, in the first quarter of 2012, the proportion of unemployment in rural areas was nearly 6.5%, which fell to approximately 4.5% in the second quarter of 2012. In addition, the unemployment rate in rural regions fluctuated around 5% in the rest of the year 2012.