Writing

Dear Dr. Jalal Mobarki,
I am writing to inform you that we are dealing with a serious issue, negatively affecting our work quality, due to lack of designated parking for the employees. 

Lacking allocated parking, the office building cannot accept our vehicles. Everyday we go to work, we have to spend a lot of time to find an empty parking space to park the private vehicle, and it leads us to be late. As a result, we waste not only our time, but also energy that should be given for doing our jobs. 

Having 10 employees working, the firm is recommended to solve the parking-related issue. Because each of us are spending about one hour a year as well as wasting our energy to find a free parking space. This makes people working here exhausted. Solving this problem can help the human resources save both time and energy. 

There is a car parking that can hold up to 15 cars located in the basement floor, but it is only used for the company's guests. We host them only 4 times a year, so it is free most of the year. It could be great to allocate this place for the workers' vehicles. 

I hope you will address these concerns as soon as possible.
Yours faithfully,
Farid Barani nejad

Writing

Dear Mr. Hamilton,

I hope this letter finds you in good health. I am writing with reference to the lack of a car park for employees of the company. Unfortunately, this matter has caused a serious disturbance to us.

As you are surely aware, the area where the company is situated is populous with narrow streets that barely give employees any space to park their cars. As a result, they need to park their vehicles on other streets far from the company, leading them to be late for work and start their day with a significant amount of stress.

Having a private car park, however, not only does tackle the issue of parking for workers, but it also enhances their efficiency. In fact, they will not arrive at work all anxious and hasty only because they spent a sizeable amount of time to find a decent car park. Moreover, if the company had a car park, the staff would not be worried about the safety of their vehicles during working hours, allowing them to concentrate more on their tasks and responsibilities.

To rectify the situation, I recommend you, as the manager of the company, discuss the matter with the university in the vicinity of the company. They own a huge parking area on their campus which looks empty most of the time. In fact, I believe the company could hire a part of this space at a reasonable price to solve the car park problem for employees.

I hope you consider my humble suggestion. Thank you for your time and attention.

Yours sincerely,

Sarah Conner

Writing

Dear Mr. Smith,
I am writing regarding the parking lot absence contributing to extreme inconvenience.

The reasons why this circumstance seems to be tremendously problematic are numerous. Initially, the employees are afflicted by the strain due to the insecurity of their vehicles since they are obliged to park them in some inexpensive spaces with neither supervision nor monitoring cameras. Secondly, the workforce are compelled to walk a long distance from an external car park to get here and it would be ardous in extreme weather, in cold seasons in particular.

All a parking area provides the staff with are abundant benefits. First and foremost, it fosters labour's puncuality,this, in turn, triggers increasing productivity. The company image, moreover, could be improved, resulting in captivating more consumers, accompanied by far greater profit. Finally, the personnel are bound to reap the reward of job satisfaction impinging on their efficiency which is utterly beneficial to the company.

Were I given the chance, I would definitely rent the derelict spot in the vicinity of our workplace which used to be a playground.

I appreciate your measures to ameliorate this distressing situation in advance.

Best Regards,
Maryam Fazel

Writing

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I am writing to express my concerns regarding the daily challenges I face in finding a parking space near the company. Every morning, I am forced to spend considerable time searching for a spot, often in unsafe areas.

 

As you may be aware, the company is located in a crowded city center, where traffic congestion is severe. The lack of dedicated parking spaces further intensify this issue. This situation not only wastes employees' time but also causes stress and reduces productivity.

 

While I understand that certain costs may require, I believe addressing this parking issue would positively impact employees' energy levels and overall satisfaction. Providing a safe and convenient parking option would enhance the quality of their commute and reflect positively on the company’s commitment to its staff.

 

As a potential solution, I suggest the company consider renting a section of the multi-level parking facility at the nearby shopping center. This arrangement would greatly benefit employees and alleviate traffic around the office.

 

I hope you will consider my suggestion, and I look forward to your response.

 

Yours faithfully,

Mrs. Negin Yazdani

Writing

Dear Sir,

I am writing this letter with regard to the car park problems we have at our office building.

Most employees commute to work by their own cars. As you know, the office building is situated in a busy area, and in the early mornings, you can imagine how challenging and time-consuming it is to find a suitable car park. The workforce often has to park their vehicles far from the workplace, leading to delays in their arrival. Additionally, parking on the streets poses safety concerns, as I have recently heard several cases of car theft in the region.

If dedicated car park spaces were introduced for the employees, it would result in a noticeable change in their satisfaction and punctuality. Furthermore, a secure parking facility would reduce stress among employees and lead to a more productive and concentrated work environment.

The ideal solution would be to rent a vacant parking space located near the office. I have seen a few unused spaces around which appear to be owned by municipality. Perhaps the secretory could follow up on this matter and provide more details about their cost and availability.

I look forward to receiving your response.

Yours faithfully

Sarvenaz Heidary

Writing

The given table compares the total number of students who were registered at Manchester University during the three various years, 1937, 1967, and 2017. Moreover, other items such as students’ gender, their distance from Manchester, and the number of nationalities that they came from are investigated. 
It is clear that, in 2017 the largest number of registrations was done. Furthermore, women had more of a tendency to become educated, while this percentage declined for men. Notably, the acceptance of international students has increased within these years.
In 1937, the University of Manchester merely had 327 students that %45 of them were female, and %55 of them were male. It increased almost twenty times and reached 6254 students in 2017, and the mentioned portions were exchanged between these two genders (%55 female- %45 male). In 1967, the men earned the highest percentage, %65.
By considering the distance of registered students, in 1937 %55 of them were 40 miles far from Manchester, and in 1967 this number decreased to %15. In 2017, a maximum of 2 percent of students enrolled from the mentioned interval. In addition, the number of international applicants developed gradually during these years. To elaborate on this, %6 of the students were from 4 countries, and this number increased to %7 by 26 nations, respectively in 1937, and 1967. In 2017, the university applied for students from 102 countries and allocated %32 of applicants.

Writing

The given chart compares three components among pupils’ demographics at Manchester University in 1937, 1967 and 2017.

Overall, the number of registrations, the sex of students and their residential locations were analyzed. Moreover, not only did the number of enrolments see a dramatic increase, but also the proportion of overseas students had grown continuously, overtaking the locals in 2017.

In 1937, the total number of students who enrolled at Manchester university was 327 people among whom more than half were males (55%). Furthermore, while 55% of them resided within 40 miles of Manchester, only 6% came from four foreign countries.

With regard to 1967, the number of new students became about three-fold as high as that of 1937 and the proportion of males rose by 10%, reaching 65%. However, the percentage of indigenous students plunged into 15%, and instead, students from 26 different countries contributed, accounting for 7% of the total enrolments.

Nevertheless, in 2017, there was a steep rise in the number of students which peaked at 6254 people. Following which, in this year the figure for females was 55%, exceeding males with a margin of 10%. Furthermore, although the contribution of local students dived to a negligible 2%, that of overseas students jumped to 32%, comprising 102 nations.

Writing

Over the last decades, disclosing the private lives of famous people through social media has always been debatable. Many contend that in some parts of the globe, renowned individuals express satisfaction with the intrusive nature of media broadcasting their personal lives. Others argue that well-known figures should admit to the scrutiny of privacy because they are famous. From my perspective, although keeping up with the media can bring some beneficial aspects for celebrities, including entering the public eye and endorsing products, the negative aspects of this issue should not be ignored. 

On the one hand, accepting media scrutiny by stars helps them keep their situations and careers. This agreement with publicizing personal lives means that celebrities are not only noticed by their followers but also have public recognition, which paves the way for them to sustain their fame. As an illustration, some well-known musicians, such as Britney Spears, desire to showcase their privacy through media, increasing their followers and maintaining their artistic status. Endorsing the products being used by celebrities is another plus point. By entering the public eye through the media, famous figures promote brands, mainly clothes and other accessories, making a profit for both stars and companies. Thus, only if famous people adopt to be publicized through the media is it highly likely to conserve their social position and product brand endorsement.   

Notwithstanding, it is argued that notable individuals have the right to keep privacy, preventing some consequences, including emotional distress and a lack of personal freedom. To clarify more, should celebrities' lives be showcased through the media, such invasions of privacy would have a significant adverse effect on their mental health and well-being. For instance, 90% of star players such as Jonny Depp get depressed after disclosing their adverse personal lives. Respecting personal boundaries among renowned people is another key point that should be considered. Accordingly, being famous does not mean the media have the right to publicize their privacy and should be responsible for its coverage. Therefore, the more private lives of stars are disseminated by the media, the more celebrities are faced with mental problems.

In conclusion, although celebrities' admission through broadcasting their personal lives can boost their position by being raised in public communities or by endorsing the products they use, in my view, respecting privacy is the right of all notable people to maintain their mental health and prevent emotional disorders.  

Writing

While it is sometimes alleged that the government should be expected to provide residents with free housing, others subscribe to the idea that the state cannot be in charge of free property. There are convincing reasons accounting for both notions, which will be elaborated,  followed by my perspective on the matter.

On the one hand, those who advocate for free housing provided by the government point out that  this policy may pay dividends. First and foremost is to boost living standards in a  society. In other words, the more governments  could furnish citizens with free houses, the more economic well-being might be. To illustrate, in many developed countries, many employees could stand a chance to dwell in houses without paying any rental expenses, which might cultivate welfare in a country. Moreover, not only could this strategy  foster living standards in society, but it also could enhance life satisfaction. That is to say, should residents  experience a life  in free houses, They are less likely to  work hard to afford rental expenditures. Therefore, they might have more time to spend with family and friends, thereby feeling more content with their lives.

On the other hand, others place a premium on the fact that the provision of free properties is not the responsibility of the state owing to some compelling reason. To begin with, were the government to spend public money on free property, it would place a heavy financial  burden on governments, so they are hardly ever able to expend public funds on infrastructures such as a construction of high-cotemporary hospital or roads, which can be the most significant role of governments. Furthermore, provision of free houses for indigenous people can steer them toward consumerism. Simply put, individuals living in free houses are less likely to construct their own houses or set aside money for buying a house.

To conclude, although some individuals attach a great importance to provision of free residential property by government,  I am of the firm conviction that public funds might be expended on magnificent infrastructures.

Writing

In recent years, the issue of whether the government should provide free housing has caused considerable debate among a group of people. While some individuals imply that it is the government’s duty to ensure everyone has access to a house, others argue that this responsibility should not be carried out by the government. I present my own opinion after examining both viewpoints.

People who support the idea often mention that social equity and justice are the main reasons of their support. They argue that housing is a basic human right and every individual should have access to safe and stable housing. Providing housing could significantly lead to homelessness reduction. Moreover, stable housing can lead to a more productive workforce and better public health outcomes due to the fact that it decreases the stress and health issues.

On the other hand, opponents argue that providing free housing puts a substantial financial load on the government, which could lead to higher taxes and reduced funds for other essential services. They believe that this could make people rely on the government instead of striving for self-sufficiency. Additionally, they suggest that the government’s role should be limited to provide facilities to make housing market more affordable.

In my view, the government should help with housing but not be the only provider. A balanced approach works best, combining government aid with private sector efforts. The government can support vulnerable groups, like low-income families, the homeless, and people who live in poverty, with subsidies.

In conclusion, the debate over whether the government should provide free housing is complex. While there are compelling arguments on both sides, I believe that a balanced approach that involves both government support and private sector solutions is the most effective way to address housing requirements.