Writing

Dear Mandana,

How have you been? I missed the wonderful time we spent together when I was in your city, Toronto. I hope to see you here in Tehran. As you know in spring, the weather in Tehran is excellent and I think we can make valuable memories.

First, I’d like to thank you for your hospitality, and I want to invite you to Tehran to make up a little part of your favor. Since you have always been enthusiastic about historical places, and there is a wide range of ancient monuments in Tehran, I think visiting Tehran would be a great idea to spend your holiday.

The second issue that I want to draw your attention to is regarding your car. During my stay, due to your crash, some parts of your car were damaged considerably and your car’s left door wouldn’t close properly.

Finally, to rectify the situation, I had to replace the faulty components with brand-new ones. Also, your car’s left door should be repaired by a specialist, and I could not fix it.

Drop me a line, and let me know what time and date would work for you to travel to Iran. I can’t wait to see you.

 

Yours,

Atousa Sadeghzadeh.

Writing

The diagram displays the main steps of Pu’erh tea production in two manners, including Pu’erh raw tea and Pu’erh ripe tea.

Overall, the production process of both Pu’erh ripe tea and Pu’erh raw tea constitutes of six steps, which until the fourth step are equal. Through these stages tea leaves undergo frying, rolling, drying, compression, fermentation (only for ripe tea) and aging (just for raw tea).

Regarding Pu’erh raw tea, firstly, tea leaves are put in frying pan and heated to inactivate enzymes’ activity. Once tea leaves are rolled, they must be dried under the sunlight in order to remove the humidity, which provides loose raw tea in the fourth phase. Before aging them by storage, compress loose raw tea in circular mold. Ultimately, end product known as Pu’erh is ready to consume.

With regard to Pu’erh ripe tea, after the first fourth phase, which are same as Pu’erh raw tea, ferment loose raw tea by mold, producing loose ripe tea. For the final stage, it should be compressed to produce Pu’erh ripe tea, which is produced sooner than Pu’erh raw tea due to have no need for aging.

Writing

The diagram illustrates how two different types of tea, namely Pu-erh raw and Pu-erh ripe teas, are processed to yield the final products.

Overall, it can be seen that the first three steps of making both teas are identical. However, the later steps are different, with vintage Pu-erh tea made by aging, while Pu-erh ripe tea is manufactured by fermentation.

For the first three shared steps, the enzymes of tea leaves are initially inactivated using the pan-frying method, which involves heating the leaves from the bottom. After being rolled, the leaves are left to dry under the sun. The result is loose raw tea, which is then further processed using two different methods. 

To make vintage Pu-erh tea, the loose raw tea is compressed, yielding an agglomeration of green Pu-erh raw tea. Only when this raw tea is stored will it age, culminating in the vintage Pu-erh raw tea as the final product.

For preparing the other type of tea, the loose raw tea is fermented by molds, resulting in the fermented loose ripe tea. With compression, this ripe tea turns into Pu-erh ripe tea.

Writing

 The bar charts illustrate what paths the UK graduate and postgraduate alumni followed not including full-time jobs in 2008.

 

Overall, further study was the most popular between both groups, whereas voluntary work was their least common choice. Furthermore, the gap in the numbers of part-time work and further study among graduates was noticeably larger compared to postgraduates.

 

In the case of graduates, further education was by far the most persued path with almost 30,000 students. The number of unemployed and part-time workers were both over 15,000, ranked third and second among the given paths, respectively. Only 3,500 students did volunteer work which is less than a fifth of the ones who sought part-time positions.

 

Postgraduate figures are significantly lower than the graduates’ in general. In addition, there was a difference of less than 200 participants in the number of individuals who decided to continue studying and their part-time employed counterparts. Voluntary work was chosen by only 345 students which is substantially fewer than their unemployed peers. 

Writing

The debate over whether individuals should remain in a single job for their entire career or frequently change positions has garnered considerable attention. Although, changing jobs for some reasons is rational, I believe that staying in a job is more beneficial.

Some individuals may prefer to change their occupations for several reasons, one of which is enabling them to acquire a wider range of skills and knowledge across various industries. Subsequently, if individuals change job frequently, they may gain diverse experiences that their employability. For example, during recession when a large number of employers may lose their job, those who have secondary skills can find another proper job in a relative short time. Secondly, changing job can lead to networking opportunities allowing for meeting new people, expanding professional networks and learning from different environments that enhance a resume. Finally, switching jobs can prevent monotony and burnout, keeping work engaging and motivating.

Despite above argument, there are people who prefer to have a life-long employment in a specific job because I believe that this provides financial stability and benefits such as pensions and health insurance which are considered as job security. Moreover, staying with one company fosters loyalty, which can result in promotions and career advancement as well as development of strong relationships with colleagues and management, leading to a more harmonious work environment. For instance, as all of the main members of a company have worked together for a long period of time, some factors from team-working to efficiency of outcomes are more successful because of their not only familiarizing with each other but also comfort environment. Additionally, long-term employees can develop deep expertise and become highly skilled in their field.

In conclusion, in spite of several merits of changing job over the life time, in my view, the perspective of employment in one certain job for a long time has more advantages.

Writing

There is an ongoing debate about whether people should stick to a life-long job or change their jobs a couple of times during their lifespan. I presume that working in the same job and becoming an expert in it may be more sensible and fruitful, as people can gain more experience as well as money. 

On the one hand, working in a same job can provide individuals with chances to get sooner promotions. In other words, the more they spend time in the same field, the more they are likely to learn the ropes of that, therefore, they may be offered numerous options, such as early promotions and higher remunerations. Moreover, not only does this issue help them master a special job, but it also aid them with securing validation and recognition, which can be vital criteria in job settings, since they can forge ties and establish professional networks with people in order to have more productive and purposeful collaborations. To cite an example, working in a same job for prolonged period of time, people can easily undertake major and crucial responsibilites because their bosses consider them as trustworthy individuals, who are commited to their jobs,  and they can receive higher salaries and other options, such as more off-duty days, through taking on such sensetive tasks. 

On the other hand, some contend that frequent shifts in jobs may be compelling, as it can break the monotony associated with similar duties. They claim that, follow a repititive routine can be exhausting, hence switching various jobs may serve as a respite from doing dull jobs, which allow them to socialize with new and different people as colleagues. However, this argument overlooks the fact that trying different jobs can be time-consuming and draining, as poeple have to allot considerable amount of time and energy to develop new skills. For instance, people, who change their job more often, are more vulnerable to become bewildered that which job to choose and waste their precious time in this process.    

To conclude, while embarking on a new job frequently may be moodlifting, as it provides people with new environments and colleagues, I believe it poses many drawbacks because people have to learn new skills and responsibilities, which may hinder getting promoting and earning decent living. 

Writing

While some individuals believe that having a job for life is more beneficial, others claim that it is better to change it from time to time. From my perspective, people should change their jobs only if they are not satisfied with it.

 

On the one hand, some people advocate for persuing a carear for the entire life because of the hands-on experience that one would propably gain. In fact, they suggest that as the time spans, individuals would foster their skills in their works, which can lead to promotions in the imminent future. Furthermore, if people can keep their occupations, they would be known in their field and consequently, foster their remunerations. For instance, engineers in the petrochemical plants in southern part of Iran are paid higher each year, which illustrates this fact so clearly.

 

On the other hand, some insist on changing jobs since it can ameliorate one's soft skills. In other words, they think that having numerous jobs would improve how people can handle different situations, gain more experience, and make more connections in different fields. Additionally, when people work in different types of jobs, they would become much more likely to figure out their true talents and their life goals. For example, an introvert teacher who is not satisfied in the academic environment (as it requires to much interaction with other people), would be more successful in world of art, where he work all alone in his/her house.

 

I, personally, think that the solution lies somewhere in between. I think considering the fact that keeping the same job would possibly lead to more income and reputation, employees and people should only look for other jobs and change their careers only if they have monotonous jobs. In fact, changing one's occupation should only happen if there is no or low job satisfaction.

 

In conclusion, dealing with people's career is a complex issue which requires deep considerations. From my point of view, although both groups have reasonable points, people should seek different jobs only if they are not happy in their current position as keeping the same job would possibly result in higher income and make them more reputable in their field.

Writing

It is stated that people should stick to one job for their whole life, while others argue that people benefit more by changing jobs repeatedly. The first group's preference stems from their strong commitment and lack of adaptability, whereas the second group may struggle with an ordinary life without that excitement and adventure. However, I think that people should be free to change their work justifiably.

There are two main reasons why some people believe that staying in the same job is the best option. Firstly, people would find themselves closely dedicated to the organization that they work for, and consequently, they hardly consider applying for another position. In the majority of cases, it stems from their strong sense of commitment and dedication. For example, many teachers in my country have complained about their salaries for years, yet they continue with their careers. Furthermore, some individuals may find it difficult to accustom themselves to changing their workspace and colleagues. This is especially common among individuals who struggle with effective communication.

On the other hand, people who share this belief that humans are allowed to shift to other positions whenever they want are mostly seeking to satisfy their personal ambition. They are determined to experience a stimulating professional life by carrying out a diverse range of jobs. For example, nearly all entrepreneurs gain experience in multiple companies before realizing their true ambition to start their own business, and changing positions has often led to outstanding success. This group of people has different aspirations and welcomes changes and unintended events. I personally have seen them more successful and satisfied in their lives as they do not get bored with their occupation. So, I justifiably agree with them.

In summary, it is true that some people tend to see company loyalty more valuable and beneficial because their commitment or their weakness in adjusting to changes. Nonetheless, I argue that as adventurous individuals tend to lead more satisfying lives by shifting to another profession or job freely.

Writing

It is widely acknowledged that working just in a single job is better. However, others claim that changing jobs is better. I absolutely agree with staying in one occupation, and the main reasons associated with this belief are as follows:

 

To commence with, a certain segment of the populace holds the notion that being in a profession and continuing it is better because people become familiar with it and gain invaluable insights, wisdom, and experience. Furthermore, the level of their awareness will increase, and then they will be able to earn an excellent income from this job, providing them with a profound sense of satisfaction, contentment, and comfort. For instance, when people choose one job in their lives, it encourages them to continue it because they have found a clear vision for it. As a result, it is a more stable path.

 

Conversely, it has been said by others that it is better to change jobs. Sometimes, staying in just one career may not cover financial needs, and individuals will not be able to afford to provide for their expenses. Moreover, humans should use opportunities to alter their professions. If they take this path, it not only helps them expand their knowledge and ideas but also contributes to making a decision about whether it is good to stick to that job or not. For example, if workers do not earn a lot of money, they can think about opting for other favourite activities that they are eagerly and deeply enthusiastic about pursuing. Therefore, they may feel more satisfied.

 

In conclusion, despite the fact that changing a career can help people earn a better income and expand their information, I firmly believe that it is better to follow just one occupation because people will become more familiar with it and can achieve an outstanding improvement. Consequently, it is my underlying standpoint that should be recognised.

Writing

It is widely acknowledged that some people believe working in a single, stable job throughout one’s lifetime is more beneficial, whereas others argue that frequently changing jobs is a better approach. In my view, the latter perspective is more logical due to several key reasons. This essay will examine both perspectives and explain why I am more inclined to agree with the latter view.

 

On the one hand, proponents of permanent employment argue that is more productive, citing several key reasons. Firstly, examining their belief reveals that they assume the more a person concentrates on a single job, the greater job satisfaction they will experience. In other words, this focused commitment is believed to lead to higher productivity. Secondly, this group think that if individuals want to apply for a government job, they are more likely to succeed if they have more experience in stable jobs rather than temporary ones. For instance, I observed that someone who had already worked in a permanent job was able to get a position in the public sector, while another person with no experience was not. Nonetheless, I remain unconvinced by this argument.

 

On the other hand, there are those who refute the pervious viewpoint due to several fundamental reasons. First and foremost, from a psychological perspective, they have concluded that human ambitions are likely to change over time, therefore, if they just stick to a fixed job, it may lead them to be depressed as it prevents them from pursuing their evolving desires. Furthermore, they firmly believe that the more people explore different fields for their income, the more insight and creativity they will gain through diverse experiments. To clarify, from scientific viewpoints, it is evident that if someone try various fields, the connections between their brain neurons will be strengthened as a result of engaging different parts of the brain. Ultimately, this process enhances creativity.

 

In conclusion, it appears that not only can the former opinion bring benefits, such as job satisfaction and a better chance of being employed in government carriers, but the latter view also offers merits like gaining more insight and creativity, as well as avoiding psychological disorders, such as depression. However, since shifting interests in humans are inevitable, I tend to agree more with the latter view.