Writing

It is argued that employers should not emphasize employees' attire and appearance, as the quality of work is the most vital factor. While an employee's dress might be important for some reasons, it should not be prioritized over the quality of their work. 

To begin with, employees' outfits based on an official dress code at work can give customers an impression of professionalism and seriousness. For example, according to a global survey, people naturally tend to ask questions and take advice from those with neat, offical suits rather than individuals with casual clothes because of the better first impression and a sense of trust the first group gives to clients. As a result, many companies prefer to consider a special dress code for their workers, especially in sections such as customer service in which client intercation is key. Moreover, with the increasing number of multinational companies around the world, having a written, official regulation for dressing at work reduces the chance of conflict due to different perspectives about clothes. These kinds of arguments, which mainly stem from cultural differences, can greatly affect a business's productivity but can be addressed by considering neutral yet strict official clothes. 

While graments may attract more customers and provide a comfortable work environment for workers, it is a tiny fragment that can enhance efficiency. Other aspects such as productivity, creativity, and innovation are fundamental values of a company and in some ways more significant. For instance, many companies today especially those related to IT and artifical inteligence allow their employees to wear what they feel comfortable in after industrial psychologists realized that a relaxed dress code can greatly boost people's productivity and innovation. In addition, emphasizing too much on dress can lead to a biased approach when it comes to recruiting new staff. Consequently, many talented, creative people with different dress code preferences may be deprived of having their favorite job. 

In conclusion, while it is claimed that having a dress code is critical to build a professional image of a company and a relaxed work environment, I assume putting more importance on factors which can enhance better performance of a company, such as productivity and innovation, would be better for businesses.

Writing

Nowadays, it seems that authorities are becoming more wary of how their employees dress in office environments. Regarding this, some experts suggest that clothing choices should not be a concern. On the other hand, the level of employee performance should be taken into consideration first. In this essay, I will explore this perspective and share my own opinion.

There could be numerous factors why some companies prefer to be strict about clothing in the workplace. One reason they often cite is to prevent distraction. They believe inappropriate dressing, such as overly bright or colorful clothes, may be a significant distraction for employees and, as a result, reduce their performance. Another reason managers emphasize is the desire for the workplace to look neat, orderly, and harmonious. This is why several companies provide their own uniforms for their employees.

On the other hand, some individuals claim that it is not worth it to focus on clothing. I completely agree with them. In this case, they present almost the opposite of the reasons mentioned earlier. Whether workers allow themselves to be distracted by their colleagues' clothing and ruin their work is up to them. Because of this, they also argue that it would be better if these types of people were not employed in the first place—those who cannot commit to their duties properly. Additionally, working in a colorful, vibrant environment has the potential to help workers improve their job quality by keeping them joyful and away from boredom. Moreover, allowing them to wear whatever they want not only keeps them motivated but also saves everyone the trouble of arguing about unnecessary issues like dress codes.

In conclusion, to avoid distraction and to appear neat and visually harmonious, some organizations tend to enforce a uniform code and monitor and discipline their employees accordingly. On the other hand, some people argue that implementing a more relaxed dress code would be a better choice. Allowing various outfits and eliminating restrictions on clothing is likely to keep employees engaged in their duties and uplift their performance. I fully align with the second perspective. Letting people dress however they like is more likely to create a positive work environment.

Writing

 Employers have different approaches regarding the attire of employees. Some strictly establish a dress code, while others solely focus on performance. I strongly believe that corporations must allow employees to dress as they choose and instead focus on employees' proficiency.

A workspace without any restrictions on attire provides a safe place for various people to work as a team for the company’s development. It will benefit the company if the manager assesses an individual’s competence rather than their clothing style when recruiting or while they are working. For example, a young person whose style might not conform to the conventional taste of other employees would probably bring new and unique insights to their area of expertise.

Additionally, planning a dress code and constantly checking whether employees abide by it requires excessive managerial time and energy. One way for companies to tackle the issue of inappropriate attire in the workspace is to design a uniform dress, which requires hiring a professional designer. This is nothing more than an additional expense. Moreover, this project consumes significant time that could be spent boosting the company, for example, by holding sessions to identify the company’s issues and find ways to resolve them.

Some might argue that a dress code reinforces a company's image and reputation. Some claim that it is crucial for corporations to have a strict dress code as it is part of their branding identity and has significant importance in shaping people’s perception of the company. However, most employees do not ever encounter any customers. In addition, reputation and image must derive from the quality of service or product rather than branding.

In conclusion, I contend that employers should completely abandon strict dress codes and focus solely on employee proficiency. Prioritizing employee competence over dress codes fosters a more inclusive, creative, and efficient work environment and also saves valuable time and resources.

Writing

Nowadays, there is a dilemma concerning the appearances of employees in the work place. Some people believe that employers must not care about how their employees dress and their productivity is of greater concern. while there are limits to this significance, i generally believe the quality of work is significantly more vital.

Some might argue that the way someone dresses at their job directly depicts their professionalism. For instance, a large company’s CEO might not be respected by their employees anymore, if they were seen wearing shabby and unpleasant clothes. When it comes to showing up to the wrorkplace, people expect to see a certain type of clothes like an ironed suit with no extra prints and designs. Similarly, the same might be accurate for employees. Some employers prefer having their inferiors represent the company's values which are commonly sophistication and professionalism. These firms usually regulate strict laws concerning dresscode, because they are of the opinion that a sophisticated company memebr should also dress as such.

On the other hand, many company authorities let their employees be responsible for their own dress choices. Usually, in such companies the boss provides a free environment where people are mentally and physically comfortable. Since many corporate jobs have people spend more than 8 hours of their day in an office, they focus on nurturing an atmosphere where the employees have an ease of mind when coming to work. Consequently, they care more about the outcome of their jobs. This means that while the employees are allowed to choose how they dress, they have higher expectations about the quality of the work and thu, the employers are expected to be productive in their daily tasks rather than how they look.

In conclusion, i am of the opinion that employers should mostly focus about the quality of their employees’ work instead of their dress choices. While there are some benefits to looking professional such as being respected as a sophisticated company member, being mentally at ease makes many people more productive in their job.

Writing

Attire in the workspace is to a person what the cover package is to a product, important but not the essence. Some may claim that workers should not have dress codes in the workspace and they should only be judged based on their work quality. I partially disagree with this statement since I believe while the quality of work outweighs the worker's appearance, certain industries require a minimum level of formality and dress code.

On the one hand, qualification definitely takes precedence over dressing in the workplace. Critical skills like problem-solving, communication, and perseverance are what truly contribute to an organization's success rather than their employees' appearance. For instance, tech giants like Meta and Google, adopted flexible dress codes for their employees, allowing them to choose to wear clothes that align with their culture and personality instead of something that authorities in charge forced them to wear. This approach helps employees to shift their mindset to more substantial matters and improve their overall productivity. If strict dress codes were imposed in such places, many employees would focus on their appearance instead of their work. 

However, certain industries require a minimum level of formality, which mostly starts with their employees' appearance. Law, medical care, and even restaurants are some of the industries that, unlike tech companies, interact with customers or patients directly. People are drawn to places that can feel a sense of reliability and genuineness. Imagine a lawyer wearing blue skinny jeans instead of a formal suit to the court, diminishing the formality and his respect for the audience. On the other side, take a restaurant as an example in which workers have a united dress, leaving behind a sense of cleanliness to their customers. These all show that specific industries, especially ones that interact directly with clients, require proper appearance in the workspace to prosper.

In conclusion, while employees' working quality and range of skills should be prioritized over appearance, some certain industries that interact directly with their clients must adopt relevant dress codes to succeed.

Writing

Some people think corporate dress codes shouldn't be of a concern, and employers should only judge based on the work quality. However, I disagree with this statement because some dress codes are important from mental and physical perspective, and abandoning them can lower the quality of work. 

Formal attire can have both psychological and physical purposes. On one hand, these clothes can help workers build a sense of confidence. Not only that but, special dress codes can also foster a sense of unity among employees. Many police officers who wear the special uniform feel confident when they chase a criminal because it gives them a sense of authority, also it makes them feel as a member of a big organization of police department. In terms of physical objectives of some suits, in some work conditions, special suits are designed by professionals to protect workers from potential risk at work such as welding suits for welders to protect their them from skin or eye damage.

Moreover, I believe the job quality might decline if employers forgo formal dressing at work. For a salesman whose job is to persuade other people to buy their product, dressing casually can impair their first impression, which is claimed to be very important in sales. In fact, appearing in a sloppy cloth as opposed to wearing a formal dress can imply a lack of seriousness in work ethic, resulting in failed deals at negotiation tables. Additionally, adopting this policy will compromise order in the workplace. The resulted comfort would cause some employees to mistook their work environment as their home which can further exacerbate the issue of seriousness in work by loosening the obedience to rules. 

In conclusion, I believe special and strict dress codes in work settings are important because some of these not only boost the confidence of workers but also it helps to protect them from dangerous work conditions. Additionally, weak policies regarding this can affect the work quality in such environments. 

Writing

Staff clothing reveals some fact about organizational culture and the atmosphere of a company. Some argue that, an employee's style is not the biggest concern of the business holder. They should only take the quality of work into account for judging. Although personnels should not choose abnormal or anti-valued clothes, interfering with people personal preferences is unacceptable.

It is undeniable that appearance is the first step of persuasion. In other words, our clothes convey a special massage to others about how approachable and welcoming we are. Harmonic and neat items seem appealing for customers because it carries an unconscious massage of responsibility for them. According to many psychological studies, staffs wearing reasonable pieces of cloth can enhance the customer loyalty and help building up a reliable relationship with them. They can convince other easily in comparison with those dressing sloppily. Secondly, wearing light make up which is not eye-catchy and having neat hairstyle, causes positive attitude about your personality. To clarify, people tend to be persuaded by individuals who they positively interpret their characteristics. To conclude, the way you appear is the first key of communication. Unless you shun the mainstream, nobody should be allowed to blame you for your choices in clothing.

Needless to say, respecting each individual's personal boarders, is counted as one of the basic human rights. Each person make decision about her outlook independently. For instance, the way of clothing or whether they want to put make up or not. These manners lead to lower self-confidence and self-esteem of employees and eventually urge them to resignation. Additionally, these kinds of caution contribute to toxic work atmosphere as it upset the personnel. It triggers people to defense the manager since they feel invasion. As a result, the manager should never meddle the employees' preferences just because he pays their salaries.

In conclusion, well dressing is a sign of accuracy and reliability. However, criticizing people taste of clothing is a rude behavior which causes many challenges between the employers and employees. To minimize these drawbacks, it is better to determine an unique uniform for company members.   

Writing

Some people believe that managers and the person who hires other people to work for them, have not to pay attention to their workers' appearance and clothes but they just have to take their work quality into account and the fact that they are good enough to get that job or not. This essay will discuss about both sides and their advantages and disadvantages and gives a final overview.

First of all, having the ability to do that job as well as possible is a very important thing to be considered so before hiring someone in a company, the employer should care much about this fact because if an employee doesn't do the significant job in the way that he has to, the customers or people who use that service won't be satisfied with that and their number decreases and it will be a failure to that company. For instance, if a health clinic employs people don't have enough knowledge or experience, they won't do their responsibilities well and the clients number start to become lower and lower, so the clinic's earnings decrease.

Otherwise, if the manager of a company doesn't care enough about their workers' style the way that they dress, even if they provide the best services, users if those services, subconsciously, won't like to use that service. For example if the health clinic that I've mentioned before, do the best job that a health clinic can do but their personnels don't look good and beautiful or smell bad or things like that, it can effect users' decision and their preference of going there or not and it can make them not like to communicate with the workers of that clinic.

In conclusion, I think both are important in different ways. Obviously the job quality and the knowledge of workers are more important but also their appearance is important too and a company should pay enough attention to both sides to make the job successful.

Writing

It is believed that having a dress code should not be important for managers, however, they should focus on improving workers performance at workplace. I give my vote to former view, which wearing uniforms may have benefits for either employer and workers.

On the one hand, the adverse effects of having a dress code at workplace cannot be ignored. To commence with, the freedom of employees could be invaded, when they have to wear uniform at their workplace. This means that uncomfortable uniforms may have a negative impact and on work performance, which means in unsatisfying circumstances employees may not do their best work at workplace.    

On the other hand, some renowned companies have forced employees to wear uniforms to preserve their reputation and popular belief about their brand. To start off with, most well-known companies have tried to make stunning pictures of their brands, that is always important for them to be unique in people's minds. What businesses have done is make a good imagination about their brands, which having a dress code may help them to be distinguished from their rivals. Another interesting thing that should be taken into account is that some uniforms are essential for hygienic or safety reasons. That is to say, manufacturers who operate in the food industry should provide uniforms for their workers, which is highly important employees’ workplaces to be isolated from the microbes.

In conclusion, it is argued that having a dress code may be beneficial for business, whereas others assume that worker performance should be improved. I am of the notion that wearing a uniform may make a good picture for the brand, which makes the business look more professional among competitors. And also, employers should focus on employees’ uniforms at work for companies that their domine work is correlated with people's health.         

Writing

It is argued that productivity of employees hold higher significance than their choice of clothes, and it is what employers should care about. I firmly agree with this notion, as such matter allows people to wear comfortable prefered garments at their jobs, thereby increasing their productivity. Additionally, it can instill a sense of value and steem into individualls.

First and foremost, wearing comfortable clothing can has an elemental role in lessening exhaustion in workplace. In other words, people, particularly who has a full-time job, must wear apparel, which do not confine their movements and do not inflict extra fatigue on poeple. Therefore, such clothes can mitigate daily work tension and tiredness and convert workplace into a more bearable and pleasurable place. For example, uniforms, by and large, are tight and sometimes are not tailored individulas' bodies and needs, making them uncomfortable and bothersome.

Further, employers can cultivate a sense of value and respect through optional work clothes because they let their employees to choose for themselves. Should people themselves be in charge of such decision, they are more likey to feel that their perspectives are respected, which can render them content and more satisfied with their jobs. Thus this can bolster their loyalty as well as commitment to their jobs. To cite an example, having freedom to choose desirable clothes for work, poeple can hone invaluable skills, namley self-confidence, because their employers' behavior ensure that their viewpoints does matter and they always consider their viewpoints.

To conclude, While employees' clothes influenced by some limitations can make the workplace more integrated, I presume that were people to choose their clothing freely, they would be more likely to feel comfortable , loyal ,and valued in their career settings.