Writing

Dear administrators,

 

I am composing this correspondence in response to your ad about developing environmental protection.

I am Reza Mirshafiei and graduated from the University of Fine Arts with a major in painting. Because of my interest in preserving our surroundings in a suitable approach, I have actively and eagerly pursued several courses pertinent to that, about how to react to adverse consequences of household gas
emissions and the air pollution under the guidence of highly regarded and prominent senior instructors to gain all my qualifications and become familiar with these conditions. 

 

As outlined, I have a deep passion for
undertaking voluntary duties to fulfill my
responsibilities in this project. Furthermore, I
would like to participate in some seminars as
a motivational speaker to share my experiences and educate them to  enhance the quality of their awareness about the significance of making various sections and zones free of litter and also utilizing public conveyance to minimize the air pollution to have high-quality weather.

 

I am accessible from Mondays to Wednesdays in the afternoons at two to five o'clock. Moreover, I want to have constructive
cooperation and interaction with your firm. Therefore, I am confident that your invaluable
assistance in this matter will be greatly appreciated, as I endeavor to meet your expectations.

 

I eagerly anticipate receiving your affirmative response.

Yours faithfully,
Reza Mirshafiei

 

 

 

Writing

The line graph provides information about the incomes ($) three bakeries earn yearly in Calgary, over a ten- year period, starting in 2000. Overall, the greatest fluctuation in earnings was observed in Amandine Bakery's income over these years. Despite the fact that the highest income was recorded for Amandine Bakery, Bolo Cakery accounted for the smallest portion of total income. Furthermore, two intersection points were observed in the distribution of these earnings.

In terms of Amandine Bakery, there were steady earnings until 2005, which was about $59,000. Then, a subtle increasing trend can be seen until 2007, reaching about $69,000. After that, a significant climb in earnings was observed, reaching approximately $99,000. Again, a slight increase was recorded in this bakery's total income.

Regarding Mari Bakeshop, a significant fluctuation can be seen in its total earnings. There was a rise in earnings in 2001, attaining $98,000. Then, a gradual decrease was recorded until 2003, reaching $80,000. Afterward, a peak was observed in 2004, with nearly $97,000. Surprisingly, a notable decline occurred in 2005, dropping to $61,000. Later, another peak was reached in 2007, at $60,000. Finally, earnings remained almost unchanged in the final three years, at around $40,000.

In the case of Bolo Cakery, a subtle peak and a trough can be seen in 2001 at $25,000 and in 2002 at about $21,000 in income. Then, a dramatic increase was recorded in 2003, reaching roughly $40,000 in earnings. Subsequently, a stable trend was observed until 2005, maintaining $40,000. Later, a notable increase occurred from 2007, starting at nearly $40,000 and rising to $60,000 in 2008. Lastly, a gradual growth was observed from 2008, reaching $62,000 by 2010.

Moreover, there were two intersections over these ten years, one occurred between 2005 and 2006, when the earnings of Amandine Bakery and Mari Bakeshop were approximately $60,000.  Another was observed between 2007 and 2008, when the income of Mari Bakeshop and Bolo Cakery were almost $52,000.

Writing

The place where people prefer to reside is a debate that has two sides. The first side of which advises that living in a city is of immense benefits; however, the second side insists on living in the countryside would be a better place for individuals. While the former seems to bring more plus points for people, both points of this view will be expressed.

 The proponents of living in cities believe that in different cities more infrastructure and facilities are offered by authorities. This flows from the fact that inhabitants in cities are considerably higher than that in suburbs and rural areas. As a result of this crowded population, governments in cities have to allocate more budget to diverse infrastructure and facilities in order to keep local residents satisfied. Some crucial examples of these facilities that can be mentioned are public transport, shopping centers, sport facilities, and education. It is true that these facilities may be offered in countryside, but the quality of them in cities and countryside are not comparable. Therefore, people choose cities when they face with the dilemma of whether to live in the countryside or cities.

The advocates of living in the countryside may be of the view that although in cities above-mentioned facilities and infrastructure are provided by authorities, there are some issues in cities that can be annoying for instance traffic congestion, crowded places, air pollution, and water pollution.  These problems can guarantee drastic impacts on people's day-to-day life. Crowded places including traffic jams can not only waste residents' time but also they are more likely to fall behind their tasks thanks to the lack of enough time. Supplementary to this, pollution-related problems such as air and water pollution can bring negative effects for people, particularly residents who suffer from disorders for example asthma and heart ailments. Therefore, people prefer living in the countryside to keep themselves away from these serious problems in cities.

To recapitulate, regarding the debate surrounding the place where people like to live, while some individuals are interested in living in a city, others are keen on residing in the countryside. For the main reasons that described above, I fully support the first side of this debate.  

Writing

The chart illustrates the number of students who enrolled in various university subjects based on their gender in 2005.

Overall, we can see from the data that sciences, mathematics, literature and law were more popular among males. In contrast, social sciences, languages and the arts clearly appealed more to females. The only subject that both groups chose equally was humanities.

In science and mathematics, the proportion of males was significantly larger than females, with around 22000 and 20000 male students respectively, compared to fewer than 5000 females in mathematics. A similar pattern can be observed in literature and law with smaller gap between the number of two gender. Humanities was the most balanced subject chosen by the equal number of males and females.

On the other hand, female students showed strong preference toward language, with just under 25000 enrolled students. The same pattern can be seen in social sciences and the arts, though the gap between the number of two gender was not as large as the former subject.

In general, it seems male pupils dominated technical and analytical subjects, while females tended to choose artistic and social subjects.

Writing

It is widely acknowledged that one of the beliefs of individuals is that governments should allocate more budget for public facilities, such as education and healthcare, rather than arts and cultural projects. I partially agree with this view due to several primary reasons. A thorough analysis of this matter will be provided in the forthcoming paragraphs.

First and foremost, facilitating vital necessities for people from diverse backgrounds, such as education and healthcare is one of the chief responsibilities of governments. Therefore, they should set aside a significant fund for that purpose. That is to say, the more essential the needs are, the more imperative it is for diplomats in governments to try to address them promptly. For instance, living in this digital age has led us to learn more state-of-the-art knowledge. To clarify, today, if someone aims to meet their requirements effectively, it would be more achievable by acquiring the latest knowledge.

On the other hand, fulfilling other needs, such as arts and cultural projects are also important, especially in psychological terms. To clarify, it has been proven that some chaos has been brought upon us as a result of our hectic lives. Consequently, referring to the arts can relieve our tensions created by tackling difficulties to some extent. Additionally, if governments are willing to preserve the identification of their country, it would be more logical to spending on cultural projects. That is to say, the more important cultural identity becomes, the more essential it is for governments to invest in its preservation.

To sum up, in my view, both aspects should be considered by governments. Not only do public services play a vital role in people's lives by meeting their necessary needs, but  spending on arts and cultural projects is also important, one helps us unwind and the other one is closely tied to our identity. Thus, I partially agree with that view in the prompt

Writing

Nowadays, there is a debate about which place is better for living, and it is a controversial issue among people. Some individuals think that living in a city can provide better facilities than living in the suburbs, while others believe that living in the countryside is more beneficial. As I concur with the second view, I will examine both perspectives and explain their points in this essay.
On the one hand, some people tend to live in a city more than the suburbs because of some objects. First, they can achieve better economic and social situations in a city. In big cities, there are many manufacturers or production centers and institutions, so job opportunities are more for people. For example, they can find better jobs in urban areas such as Tehran and Esfahan in my country which in turn provides a higher social situation. In addition, the educational system for children and students is more advanced in the cities. Since parents place a great deal of importance on their children's education, they prefer to live in the city to provide appropriate education for them. 
On the other hand, those who live on the outskirts have some benefits. In suburbs, air and noise pollution are less than in urban areas which leads to a healthier life. This means people can consume healthy food, breathe fresh air, and less traffic. Living in the countryside also has a calmer and quieter environment which in turn helps individuals improve their mental health. In other words, people in the suburbs can live at a slower pace, which reduces stress and has a positive effect on their mental health. So having a healthier life cannot be achieved unless by living in the countryside. 
In summary, considering the points mentioned above, I generally believe that living in the suburbs is a preferred option in comparison to living in urban areas. Although living in a city can provide better economic conditions and education for children, I think that living in healthier conditions in the countryside is more beneficial.

Writing

Some people think that living in a city is more advantageous, while others believe that living in the countryside has more benefits. Considering different aspects, I agree with the second group.

On the one hand, living in rural areas could benefit residents from living close to nature, which would positively impact people’s well-being. In addition, cost of living including, accommodations and groceries, is much lower in these areas. For example, rural people often own their homes, which means that they do not have to pay rent like urban people. They also produce their foods from livestock, not needing to buy them. This demonstrates that these people do not often struggle with high expenses, which ultimately makes their lives more peaceful and comfortable.

On the other hand, residing in urban areas offers certain upsides, such as more recreational facilities and better access to medical services. There isa wide variety of amenities which people can use to unwind and relax, as they usually have hectic and busy lifestyles. Furthermore, people living in cities have better access to medical services, providing more comfort and convenience. For example, there are lots of high-end hospitals with modern medical technologies in cities, whereas number of medical centers is much fewer in the countryside.

In conclusion, while some individuals view living in cities more beneficial, others believe that the countryside is a better place to live. I personally think that living in rural areas has more upsides than living in urban areas, as it offers more peaceful environment and lower expenditures.

Writing

It is argued that public money should go on improving public infrastructure, such an education system and healthcare, rather than on cultural and art projects. I somewhat disagree with this viewpoint. 

There are some reasons why governments should prioritize investing in improving public services. The main reason is that the public budget should benefit the whole society. In fact, the majority of low-income families cannot send their children to private schools or eat nutritious food. It is the government’s responsibility to provide them equal opportunities by providing them free or discounted healthy food and offering them high-quality education in public schools. Secondly, health services are expensive in many countries and several people who cannot afford their treatment expenses suffer from chronic pains. Thus, having free and improved healthcare system can be more necessary than spending on cultural and artistic projects. If a country’s healthcare is developed, the average life expectancy of its citizens is more likely to be increased, which can lead to overall satisfaction. 

However, it is important to invest in cultural and art projects. Firstly, the cultural and historical heritages of a country can contribute to an increase in the sense of national identity of its citizens. Thus, preserving historical and cultural attractions, such as museums, palaces, literature and poem, is an inherent responsibility of governments to make their citizens proud of their country. Additionally, the art can polish people’s soul, and since the majority of artists, such as sculptors and painters, cannot afford their living expenses, governments should support them financially. For example, governments can buy the sculptures and place them in various parts of the cities to make the cities more beautiful or provide a place for painters to exhibit their drawings. 

In conclusion, although improved education system and healthcare can contribute to satisfaction and equality in societies, public-funded cultural and art projects can lead to a rise in a national identity and make the aesthetic view of cities more beautiful. 

 

Writing

People’s opinions differ as to whether public services have to be prioritised by authorities in their expenditure in comparison to arts and cultural projects or the opposite. While both are beneficial for society, I to some extent agree with preferring funding public services.

On the one hand, choosing arts and cultural projects has merit that one cannot neglect. Cultural projects mostly define a nation's identity, and without that, even though a country has good public services, it would not proceed well enough due to society members suffering from the void inside of their national characteristics. Sculpture, music, and painting, to name but a few, are the methods that can boost the awareness of individuals who were raised and born in that country about either their identity as a nation or boldly present a bright course that in the contemporary era their country is being known to it. For instance, in our county, a few decades ago, a ceremony had been held at great cost to globally represent ours.

On the other hand, in my opinion, primarily budgeting municipal services has more positive points, one of which is that these are rudimentary needs of the entire community. Nowadays, one of the prevalent criteria that officials are being assessed on is the development of public services and how efficiently they are working. As an example, individuals are not as concerned about a well-known artist gallery as they emphasise the traffic congestion, water contamination, or air pollution. Moreover, I contemplate that a noticeable share of governmental amenity has to be allocated to these services, especially education, in which not only could cultural projects be integrated, but also other crucial subjects could be taught, and at the same time, both issues could be tackled.

In conclusion, although cultural projects are vital for a nation and create the identity, authorities’ preferences, in my view, have to scarcely alter to arts and cultural projects, and primarily their aim should be public services.

Writing

A number of people argue that the government should invest more in organizations such as healthcare and educational systems, as they are more important than arts and cultural programs. I agree with this point of view because in this way all members of society benefit from the public budget.

On the one hand, if the government spends more on cultural projects, it leads to a variety of social benefits for people. It is obvious that this strategy helps the community to revive their traditions, which in turn establishes a national identity. As a result, individuals will be closer to each other because they have a unifying element. In addition, it motivates people to follow their personal artistic interests, which means that we will have more artists in the future. It can improve the country’s global position in art festivals.

On the other hand, many public services struggle with acute problems because they do not have sufficient funds to meet the needs of people. Firstly, a large number of patients are in long queues at hospitals and clinics to receive treatment. This money can be used to build new hospitals and train more doctors. Secondly, an efficient educational system can make a significant contribution to economic progress by nurturing workforce. It is evident that many developed countries have prioritized their education as the most fundamental factor of advancement. Finally, public transportation and other infrastructure need to be upgraded because they cannot sustain the strain of an increasing population. 

In conclusion, it is true that allocating money to arts and cultural projects can fill the gap between people and encourage them to participate in art. However, I believe essential organizations deserve more attention, as they play a crucial role in people’s lives. Therefore, the government should improve the standards of living through the use of governmental aid to healthcare, education and other public services.